Network Associates is updatong its host and network-intrusion prevention system (IPS) solutions, as it introduces upgraded editions of McAfee IntruShield and McAfee Entercept to its existing security customers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
“The combined IPS solution has protected against every recent outbreak, even zero-day attacks,” claimed Vimal Solanki, the director of marketing for McAfee’s IPS line.<\/p>\n
IntruShield is moving to version 2.1, adding a first in the intrusion-detection system (IDS) and IPS market: the ability to protect encrypted attacks on SLL data transmissions by decrypting and inspecting the traffic. The integrity of the encrypted data and encryption keys are retained, said Solanki, and analysis of the data for signature, anomaly, and DoS attacks occurs in real time without degrading transaction speeds. Other changes to IntruShield include an internal, integrated firewall that protects the systems inside the network from attack, just as existing firewalls guard the perimeter.<\/p>\n
IntruShield’s firewall can be sliced and diced in a virtualization mode to set policies for individual machines, groups of desktops or servers, or the entire network. Version 5.0 defends desktops and servers against traditional as well as zero-day attacks-so-called because they exploit vulnerabilities not yet patched–by using signatures and profiles of known and anticipated threats. Like its IntruShield cousin, Entercept 5.0 adds integrated firewall capabilities to provide more protection between individual systems and the rest of the network, or the Internet in general.<\/p>\n
More info: http:\/\/www.securitypipeline.com\/news\/21700492;jsessionid=HPOWFZ5SDH2U4QSNDBNCKHY<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1310"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3797,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1310\/revisions\/3797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}