{"id":1383,"date":"2005-03-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-03-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/03\/01\/microsoft-no-plans-for-ie7-on-windows-2000\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:16","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:16","slug":"microsoft-no-plans-for-ie7-on-windows-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/03\/01\/microsoft-no-plans-for-ie7-on-windows-2000\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft: No Plans For IE7 On Windows 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft&#8217;s upcoming Internet Explorer 7 will run on other operating systems besides Windows XP SP2, the company&#8217;s official IE blog revealed Monday, but Windows 2000 remains off the list.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In mid-February, chairman Bill Gates promised a new version of IE before Longhorn ships, and said the new browser &#8212; which will concentrate on delivering additional security against such threats as phishing &#8212; would roll into beta this summer.<\/p>\n<p>At that time, only Windows XP SP2 was mentioned as a supported OS.  <\/p>\n<p>According to the posting on the blog, IE 7 will also work on the 64-bit edition of XP (with the long title of &#8220;Windows XP Professional x64 Edition&#8221;) and the upcoming Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1).  <\/p>\n<p>About Windows 2000 support, Microsoft hasn&#8217;t budged from its previous position.  &#8220;We have heard the requests for support of Windows 2000, but have nothing to announce at this time.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On a related subject, the blog also made clear that a new version of Outlook Express, Microsoft&#8217;s for-free basic e-mail client, would not appear with IE7.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.securitypipeline.com\/news\/60404527<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1383"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3870,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions\/3870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}