{"id":1424,"date":"2005-05-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/05\/23\/tumbleweed-adds-outbound-protection-to-e-mail-security-products\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:21","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:21","slug":"tumbleweed-adds-outbound-protection-to-e-mail-security-products","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/05\/23\/tumbleweed-adds-outbound-protection-to-e-mail-security-products\/","title":{"rendered":"Tumbleweed Adds Outbound Protection To E-Mail Security Products"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recurrent Pattern Detection provides a new layer of defense against breaking spam, phishing, spyware, virus and worm attacks sent out in e-mail blasts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tumbleweed Communications announced that it has extended its MailGate email security suite with Recurrent Pattern Detection technology.<\/p>\n<p>The new addition enables Outbreak Detection in a new layer of defense against breaking spam, phishing, spyware, virus and worm attacks sent out in e-mail blasts.  <\/p>\n<p>Statistics compiled by the company indicate less than 10% of inbound enterprise message traffic is legitimate e-mail.  Since the volume and complexity of malicious traffic grows, the company believes that multi-layer multi-technology approaches are proving to be the most successful at stopping both known and unknown e-mail threats.<\/p>\n<p>The company has positioned the addition of Outbreak Detection to its MailGate products as providing customers with a more complete approach to inbound e-mail security.  &#8220;We&#8217;re committed to providing our customers with an expansive arsenal of security features in order to combat increasingly sophisticated malicious email attacks,&#8221; said Tumbleweed CTO John Thielens.  &#8220;Outbreak Detection, combined with Tumbleweed&#8217;s other protection technology, ensures that our customers are comprehensively protected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.messagingpipeline.com\/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=163700727<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1424"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3911,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424\/revisions\/3911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}