{"id":1433,"date":"2005-06-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/06\/21\/microsoft-no-new-sybari-sales-for-unix-linux\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:22","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:22","slug":"microsoft-no-new-sybari-sales-for-unix-linux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/06\/21\/microsoft-no-new-sybari-sales-for-unix-linux\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft: No New Sybari Sales for Unix, Linux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft&#8217;s enterprise anti-virus plans do not extend to customers on Unix and Linux platforms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the day the software giant completed its purchase of Sybari Software Inc., a deal first announced in February, Microsoft Corp. announced it would immediately discontinue new sales of Sybari&#8217;s flagship Antigen suite for the Unix and Linux platforms.<\/p>\n<p>The move means that Sybari Antigen 6.0 for Lotus Domino servers running IBM&#8217;s AIX Unix operating system will be dropped from the product line.  Amy Roberts, director of product management in Microsoft&#8217;s security business and technology unit, said the company will continue to market Antigen for Domino on Windows NT.<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with Ziff Davis Internet News, Roberts said Sybari customers on the Unix and Linux platforms will continue to receive anti-virus updates through the life of the existing contract.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.eweek.com\/article2\/0,1759,1830182,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1433"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3920,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1433\/revisions\/3920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}