{"id":1436,"date":"2005-06-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/06\/27\/cisco-buys-security-vendor-netsift-for-30-million\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:23","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:23","slug":"cisco-buys-security-vendor-netsift-for-30-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/06\/27\/cisco-buys-security-vendor-netsift-for-30-million\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco Buys Security Vendor NetSift For $30 Million"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Snapping up another small security vendor, Cisco Systems said it plans to acquire NetSift for $30 million in cash and options.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>San Diego-based NetSift, a privately held, 15-employee company founded in June 2004, would add technology for deep packet processing.<\/p>\n<p>On its Web site, venture capital firm Enterprise Partners Venture Capital lists NetSift on its software portfolio and describes the company as a developer of systems to protect enterprises from large-scale worm and virus attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Cisco said the deal is slated to close in its fiscal fourth quarter ending July 30.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.crn.com\/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=C1DOYN21IMR3AQSNDBNCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=164902960<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3923,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions\/3923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}