{"id":1474,"date":"2006-05-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/02\/cingular-turns-to-mcafee-to-protect-smartphones\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:27","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:27","slug":"cingular-turns-to-mcafee-to-protect-smartphones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/02\/cingular-turns-to-mcafee-to-protect-smartphones\/","title":{"rendered":"Cingular Turns to McAfee to Protect Smartphones"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The anti-virus vendor&#8217;s McAfee VirusScan Mobile ($29.99) software will be available for download through the carrier&#8217;s MediaNet Web portal.  Victor Kounetsov, VP of McAfee Mobile, told PDAStreet the development of McAfee VirusScan Mobile was part of a strategy that the company outlined 2.5 years ago with the creation of the dedicated mobile-device security unit that he now runs.  The aim of the division is to attack mobile malware by dealing directly with operators, device manufacturers, enterprises, and &#8211; potentially in the future &#8211; with consumers.  Kounestsov said to PDAStreet, &#8220;They (Cingular) will make our technology available to their subscribers in all different segments: individuals, consumers, businesses, enterprises &#8211; on devices where this technology can be installed in an after market fashion.&#8221;  So, in the current iteration, customers must install and purchase the software themselves, through Cingular&#8217;s MediaNet Web portal, as mentioned in the opening paragraph.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kounestsov said, &#8220;The operator recognizes the importance of this technology, and works with us to provide it.<\/p>\n<p>With McAfee VirusScan Mobile, they&#8217;ve taken it to other platforms and shipped it as an aftermarket solution; maintaining the same core technology to provide security functionality to the network operator and the enterprise.  And while you can conceptually compare it to anti-virus or anti-spyware and all sorts of anti-malware for the desktop, the intent is to give operator or enterprise &#8211; not necessarily the end user &#8211; full control of what&#8217;s happening on the device.<\/p>\n<p>AVERT Labs predicted a huge increase in mobile threats; up to about 726 from 226 from 2005.    McAfee predicted that the damage caused by new mobile threats is likely to be more extensive than those caused by today&#8217;s PC threats because of the large volume of smartphones and the small percentage that are protected by mobile security.  For example, in 2004, the &#8216;I Love You&#8217; virus penetrated tens of millions of PCs in just a couple of hours despite the fact that half of all PCs had Internet security software installed.<\/p>\n<p>By comparison, a mobile threat targeting several operating systems could infect up to 200 million connected smartphones simultaneously because the majority of these devices don&#8217;t include anti-virus protection.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.pocketpccity.com\/articles\/2006\/5\/2006-5-1-Cingular-Turns-to.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1474"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3961,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1474\/revisions\/3961"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}