{"id":1482,"date":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/09\/emc-pays-153m-for-data-protection\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:28","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:28","slug":"emc-pays-153m-for-data-protection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/09\/emc-pays-153m-for-data-protection\/","title":{"rendered":"EMC Pays $153M For Data Protection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>EMC purchased data-protection and replication software maker Kashya for $153 million in cash to improve its network virtualization and continuous data protection (CDP) products.  Robert Emsley, director of marketing for information management software at EMC, said Kashya&#8217;s disaster-recovery and replication technology will prop up Invista, which pulls storage from several devices into one pool to draw from.  RecoverPoint triggers back-up and recovery tasks frequently throughout the day to ensure that data can be recovered at any point in time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EMC said Kashya&#8217;s software will extend EMC&#8217;s software portfolio for remote replication across environments consisting of different operating systems, including Windows, Linux and different flavors of Unix.<\/p>\n<p>The Hopkinton, Mass., company, whose software license and maintenance revenue jumped 11 percent to $925 million in the most recent quarter, believes making its software portfolio more granular will help it lure more customers while keeping its current clients.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.internetnews.com\/infra\/article.php\/3604826<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1482"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3969,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1482\/revisions\/3969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}