{"id":1494,"date":"2006-06-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-06-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/06\/06\/microsoft-tackles-enterprise-messaging-security\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:29","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:29","slug":"microsoft-tackles-enterprise-messaging-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/06\/06\/microsoft-tackles-enterprise-messaging-security\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft Tackles Enterprise Messaging Security"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft Tuesday launched a line of enterprise e-mail security products for its Exchange server software as the company&#8217;s first venture into corporate security since it bought Sybari Software 16 months ago.   Three renamed and reworked products &#8212; Antigen for Exchange, Antigen for SMTP Gateways, and Antigen Spam Manager &#8212; rely on multiple scanning engines from Ahnlab, Authentium, Computer Associates, Kaspersky Labs, MailFilters, Norman Data Defense Systems, Sophos, and VirusBuster to sniff out malware and\/or spam either at the perimeter edge (Antigen for SMTP Gateways) or inside the network at the Exchange server itself (Antigen for Exchange, Antigen Spam Manager).   A three-pack, dubbed Antigen Messaging Security Suite, includes all the components.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft will also debut the Antigen Enterprise Manager, a central console to control and report on the Antigen-branded defenses &#8212; but not third-party products &#8212; and will give away an add-on to Microsoft Operations Manager (MOM) 2005 that monitors the products as well as notifies administrators and alerts users of malware and spam activity.<\/p>\n<p>This is the second major security product unwrapped in the past week.  Last Tuesday, Microsoft launched its consumer security subscription service, Windows Live OneCare.<\/p>\n<p>Licari ticked off the new and improved features of the scanning components, suite, and console.  Among them: support for server clusters, digitally-signed signature updates that have been vetted by Microsoft (which pulls them from the various scan engine providers), and stored configuration and update data for rapid restart when a server goes down.<\/p>\n<p>Romania-based GeCAD, which was bought in 2003, also provided the core of Microsoft&#8217;s OneCare anti-virus protection.  &#8220;This is the first time that we&#8217;ve used GeCAD in a corporate environment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Characterizing the Antigen messaging security family as &#8220;another option for companies,&#8221; Pawlak noted that some enterprises will turn to Microsoft for anti-virus and anti-spam scanning.  <\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s the anti-Microsoft anxieties that some companies suffer.  &#8220;Companies, especially very large companies, don&#8217;t want a single vendor providing both the OS, or in this case the OS of the mail server, as well as security,&#8221; MacDermott claimed.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.informationweek.com\/management\/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=188702164<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1494"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3981,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1494\/revisions\/3981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}