Failed customer interactions, and those at risk of failure, represent a key opportunity for companies to improve the processes that matter most. American Power Conversion takes note every time a customer interaction doesn’t hit the mark–say, when a product doesn’t ship on time. APC considers that information even more valuable than its CRM success rate. The company has created an alert system to notify the appropriate employees when a customer engagement is at risk of failing, giving APC a chance to take corrective action and minimize those failures. [Website note: This is applicable to measuring security effectiveness as well.<\/i>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Mark Nadeau, director of CRM, explains that APC’s culture is geared toward avoiding failure because its business is selling uninterruptible power supplies. Uninterruptible customer satisfaction–that’s a business every company should be in. <\/p>\n
You know customer impact is critical to your company’s strategy, but how do you get there? Force the IT department to take on high-impact projects. Vanguard plots each IT project in one of nine boxes on a grid, with low, medium, and high ratings for client impact and operational impact, meaning increased revenue or lower cost.<\/p>\n
Heller sets a goal for what percentage of spending falls in each box and gets a warning on his dashboard if he’s not spending on projects with high client impact.<\/p>\n
Knowing that, CIO Catherine Boivie can make a business case to expand the e-claims system by comparing the costs for a system upgrade with the personnel costs for handling claims manually.<\/p>\n
EMC wanted to see what effect near-shore contractors would have on an internal project to deploy Automatic Data Processing’s general ledger applications at the company’s offices in Brazil. “The knowledge of local needs, challenges, obstacles are key to the overall success of territory-specific projects,” he says. The lessons learned there are helping determine the mix of in-house and outsourced staffers for other IT initiatives.<\/p>\n
Avnet business unit and IT managers jointly prioritize IT projects based on how quickly they can save money or deliver value to the company.<\/p>\n
Stuart Madnick, a professor of IT at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, and associates are developing a methodology that compares IT security measures taken by an organization and the perception that employees and managers have of the current state of security. One survey showed a gap of 0.78 on people’s awareness of good security practices and a gap of 1.08 on whether they followed those practices.<\/p>\n
Before implementing CMMI, the interface development team’s performance in meeting the model’s best practices was inconsistent. This is a critical issue for Vanguard Group, since the mutual fund company does about 80% of its interactions over the Web. So when it adds a feature, Vanguard tracks how many people start using the feature, how many get through the process, and how many drop out and where.<\/p>\n
At Global Crossing, IT staff now accompany salespeople when meeting with customers and prospects. The rationale is that no one is better prepared to explain the company’s IP-based services than the IT experts who are responsible for managing its network. And CIO Dan Wagner isn’t making this some high-minded, fuzzy goal. The tally after the first three quarters of the year: Developers have attended 175 sales calls; operations people, 125 sales calls; and security staffers, 75 sales calls. Global Crossing CIO Wagner calls the new stuff “strategic software development”; Hewlett-Packard CIO Randy Mott refers to it as innovation.<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.informationweek.com\/shared\/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=193401034<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2644,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157\/revisions\/2644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}