{"id":1650,"date":"2006-04-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/04\/01\/privacy-groups-herald-house-data-breach-bill\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:39:45","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:39:45","slug":"privacy-groups-herald-house-data-breach-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/04\/01\/privacy-groups-herald-house-data-breach-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy Groups Herald House Data Breach Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously approved a federal data breach bill this week that consumer advocates applauded as &#8220;a reasonable compromise&#8221; between citizens&#8217; protection and businesses&#8217; responsibilities.   The 41-0 vote Wednesday on the Data Accountability and Trust Act (DATA) moves the legislation to the full House, where it&#8217;s not yet scheduled for a vote.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re pleased with the compromise &#8216;trigger&#8217; language relating to when a business must notify individuals of a breach of their personal information,&#8221; said several privacy advocacy groups in a joint statement issued the day before the vote.<\/p>\n<p>The Center for Democracy &#038; Technology, the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and Consumers Union &#8212; the latter the publisher of the popular &#8220;Consumer Reports&#8221; magazine &#8212; urged the committee to approve H.R. 4127.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.securitypipeline.com\/news\/184419781;jsessionid=AWJ3C5O30AOSKQSNDBOCKHSCJUMEKJVN<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-regulations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1650"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4137,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650\/revisions\/4137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}