{"id":1790,"date":"2005-02-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-02-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/02\/22\/spyware-has-become-corporate-scourge-report\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:00","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:00","slug":"spyware-has-become-corporate-scourge-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/02\/22\/spyware-has-become-corporate-scourge-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Spyware Has Become Corporate Scourge: Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Forrester says infection level will reach 25%; 65% of companies plan to invest in new and upgraded anti-spyware tools this year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spyware has become a serious security and IT support issue, according to a new report from Forrester Research, and enterprises are increasingly turning to anti-spyware products to help control the scourge.<\/p>\n<p>According to &#8220;Antispyware adoption in 2005,&#8221; the real level of infection may be difficult to gauge, since 39% of companies surveyed had no idea how many of their systems were affected.  However, report author David Friedlander writes that the remaining respondents put the infection level as high as 17%.<\/p>\n<p>Some 80% of companies surveyed have already deployed specialized tools to deal with the problem, though Friedlander notes that, for the most part, they have not done so on a systematic basis.<\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the report finds that McAfee is the anti-spyware software market leader with a 42% share, while Lavasoft&#8217;s Ad-Aware software is in a close second at 36%.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, Friedlander predicts that there may yet be room for more players, with half of the companies that have not yet invested in anti-spyware tools planning to purchase them this year, and 65% of companies planning to buy best-of-breed products.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.networkingpipeline.com\/news\/60400837<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1790"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1790\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4277,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1790\/revisions\/4277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}