{"id":1843,"date":"2006-01-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/01\/03\/december-im-attacks-jump-826-percent-over-04\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:06","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:06","slug":"december-im-attacks-jump-826-percent-over-04","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/01\/03\/december-im-attacks-jump-826-percent-over-04\/","title":{"rendered":"December IM Attacks Jump 826 Percent Over &#8217;04"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Attacks against public instant messaging networks soared over 800 percent in December 2005, compared to the same month last year, a security company announced Tuesday.  The year&#8217;s last month saw 241 new threats, said IMlogic, down from the 307 in November and the 294 in October.  &#8220;The growth in the level of sophistication and the advanced nature of the malware payloads such as rootkits and information gathering agents sends a signal to IM users that IM security is no longer a &#8216;nice to have&#8217; technology,&#8221; Sakoda said in a statement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IMlogic has posted year-end results of its IM threat tracking efforts, including a graph showing the dramatic rise in attacks during 2005, on its Web site.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.securitypipeline.com\/news\/175800842<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1843"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4330,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1843\/revisions\/4330"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}