{"id":1888,"date":"2006-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-05T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/09\/05\/network-security-sales-top-1-1-billion-in-2q06\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:13","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:13","slug":"network-security-sales-top-1-1-billion-in-2q06","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/09\/05\/network-security-sales-top-1-1-billion-in-2q06\/","title":{"rendered":"Network security sales top $1.1 billion in 2Q06"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Worldwide network security appliance and software sales are up 2% to $1.1 billion between the first and second quarter of 2006, and is forecast to grow 30% between 2005 and 2009, when it will reach $5.1 billion, according to Infonetics Research&#8217;s latest Network Security Appliances and Software report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><b>2Q06 Highlights <\/b><br \/>\n&#8211; Cisco continues to lead in worldwide network security appliance and software sales, with 36% of total revenue, a position they have more or less maintained since 2002<br \/>\n&#8211; Juniper passes Check Point and is now in second place for worldwide revenue at 10%<br \/>\n -Check Point is now third for worldwide revenue at 9%<br \/>\n -Integrated security appliances and software make up 85% of worldwide network security revenue, IDS\/IPS 15<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.infonetics.com\/resources\/purple.shtml?ms06.sec.2q06.nr.shtml<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1888"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4375,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1888\/revisions\/4375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}