{"id":1892,"date":"2006-10-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/10\/02\/it-security-is-a-financial-headache-for-business\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:14","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:14","slug":"it-security-is-a-financial-headache-for-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/10\/02\/it-security-is-a-financial-headache-for-business\/","title":{"rendered":"IT security is a financial headache for business"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Securing a business against hacking and other forms of cyber crime is creating a financial headache for most European businesses, a new survey revealed.  A desire amongst IT managers for easier management of IT security is being undermined by complex security purchasing strategies, a pan-European survey by IT software vendor McAfee found.   The study of 600 businesses across six European countries found that while 77% of those questioned would like to have a single view of their IT infrastructure, some 29% currently use four or more management consoles.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The research, conducted by Ipsos MORI Research, revealed that in addition to multiple vendors, many businesses are deploying a large number of security technologies across their organisation.<\/p>\n<p>One of the main difficulties for businesses with multiple solutions from multiple vendors is in managing the deployment of patches.  The use of a single management console can significantly aid the deployment of patches, said Aminah Gianfrancesco, director of system security EMEA at McAfee.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.siliconrepublic.com\/news\/news.nv?storyid=single7131<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1892"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4379,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1892\/revisions\/4379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}