{"id":2112,"date":"2006-01-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/01\/16\/web-applications-are-easy-targets\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:41","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:41","slug":"web-applications-are-easy-targets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/01\/16\/web-applications-are-easy-targets\/","title":{"rendered":"Web applications are easy targets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This year kicked off with yet another panic over a vulnerability in Windows, this time an image-handling flaw that exposed users to attack if they encountered a malicious Windows Metafile (WMF).  The WMF bug caused significant damage, but less than some expected, which may indicate that the industry is gradually learning to manage client security.<\/p>\n<p>Operating systems, even Windows, are getting more secure.  Automatic software updates, running with limited user rights, safer web browsers and better firewalls are gradually making a difference.  By contrast, problems with web applications are harder to manage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One issue is the thousands of insecure PHP or other web scripts that get installed and are never updated, even when the programmers come up with fixes.<\/p>\n<p>Security experts at Netcraft, which audits web applications, typically find problems such as weak session management, SQL injection risks, buffer overflows and vulnerable debug code mistakenly left in production applications.  <\/p>\n<p>In a paper presented at the JavaOne conference last year, Cisco security architect Martin Nystrom claimed that 95 percent of web applications have flaws, with 80 percent vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.vnunet.com\/itweek\/comment\/2148638\/web-applications-easy-targets<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trends"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2112"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4599,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2112\/revisions\/4599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}