{"id":2135,"date":"2006-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-06-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/06\/07\/network-security-market-faces-a-slowdown-survey\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:45","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:45","slug":"network-security-market-faces-a-slowdown-survey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/06\/07\/network-security-market-faces-a-slowdown-survey\/","title":{"rendered":"Network Security Market Faces a Slowdown: Survey"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The market for network security appliances and software appears to be slowing down, as hardware prices drop, and as security features are increasingly built directly into Ethernet switches, according to a new report from Infonetics Research.   The report found that revenue grew only two percent between the fourth quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006, to $1.2 billion.  Overall, revenue will hit $6 billion in 2009, the reports concludes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The report also found that many customers are exploring network access control and content security solutions, which is delaying their purchase of core network security products until later in 2006.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, Jeff Wilson, principal analyst at Infonetics Research, noted in a statement, &#8220;VPN\/firewall functionality &#8212; the core of most integrated security appliance products &#8212; is truly reaching the commodity stage.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.darkreading.com\/document.asp?doc_id=96672&#038;WT.svl=cmpnews1_1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trends"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2135"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4622,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2135\/revisions\/4622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}