{"id":2164,"date":"2006-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/11\/09\/phishing-is-becoming-a-higher-value-illegal-activity-for-hackers\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:48","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:48","slug":"phishing-is-becoming-a-higher-value-illegal-activity-for-hackers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/11\/09\/phishing-is-becoming-a-higher-value-illegal-activity-for-hackers\/","title":{"rendered":"Phishing is becoming a higher value illegal activity for hackers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The size of their average catch increased almost five-fold, from $257 per victim last year to $1,244 in 2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to Gartner analyst Avivah Litan, this is happening because scammers are identifying higher-income targets, moving their phishing sites more frequently and switching up the types of business they try to impersonate.<\/p>\n<p>Victims click on links they receive in the body of e-mails &#8212; and, increasingly, in instant messages &#8212; from sites purporting to be legitimate businesses like financial institutions, e-commerce and auction sites.<\/p>\n<p>Approximately 109 million U.S. adults have received phishing e-mail attacks, up from 57 million in 2004, according to Gartner.  Total loses from phishing attacks have risen to $2.8 billion in 2006, twice the amount lost in 2004.<\/p>\n<p>According to the survey, conducted by Gartner analysts in August of this year, adults earning more than $100,000 per year are attacked more often than those making less.<\/p>\n<p>According to Litan, cyber criminals have done a better job of identifying high-income individuals.  They sell each other credit card numbers in online chat rooms, and can identify credit cards with higher spending limits by the first six digits on the card.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.internetnews.com\/stats\/article.php\/3642971<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trends"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2164"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4651,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2164\/revisions\/4651"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}