{"id":2211,"date":"2008-09-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2008\/09\/12\/enterprises-struggle-to-identify-sources-of-risk\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:40:53","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:40:53","slug":"enterprises-struggle-to-identify-sources-of-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2008\/09\/12\/enterprises-struggle-to-identify-sources-of-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"Enterprises Struggle to Identify Sources of Risk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Enterprises are putting a good deal of emphasis on risk management these days, but they don&#8217;t all agree on how to measure risk, according to a new industry study.  The annual security study, which will be published Friday by service provider BT, offers a look at enterprise security priorities and perceived threats.  The upshot: Although managing risk has become an important thread in IT security, making a business case for security technology is still a challenge.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More than a third of respondents plan to implement risk management tools across all of their business units in the next 12 months; another 26 percent will implement such tools with some business units.  In 2006, about 40 percent of respondents said internal attacks were their top concern; that figure has dropped to 33 percent.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Given all the attention that&#8217;s been paid to user awareness in the past few years, it&#8217;s sort of surprising that the user issue continues to be such a big part of the problem,&#8221; says Rick Blum, director of strategic marketing at BT.  &#8220;This will require quantifying the potential cost of data loss as well as downtime caused by a virus or other attack,&#8221; the report states.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These costs should take into account financial damages (outright theft), recovery costs (notification of affected parties, etc.), and loss of reputation (leading to loss of business).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.darkreading.com\/document.asp?doc_id=163569&#038;WT.svl=news2_1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trends"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2211"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2211\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4698,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2211\/revisions\/4698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}