{"id":2472,"date":"2003-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-11-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/11\/18\/security-certification-landscape-vendor-neutral-certs-abound\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:41:24","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:41:24","slug":"security-certification-landscape-vendor-neutral-certs-abound","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/11\/18\/security-certification-landscape-vendor-neutral-certs-abound\/","title":{"rendered":"Security certification landscape: Vendor-neutral certs abound"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The past six months have seen some additions to the vendor-neutral security certification landscape, providing organizations and individuals with an increasing range of options for training.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most notably, we witnessed the introduction of a potential major player in the intermediate- to senior-level: ISACA&#8217;s Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) certification.<\/p>\n<p>In this semi-annual update to SearchSecurity&#8217;s certification landscape series, we introduce you to the many vendor-neutral security certifications available, and we re-evaluate the importance of several older elements, as you&#8217;ll read in part two.<\/p>\n<p>This landscape features more security certifications than ever listed before &#8212; a total of 56, counting each GIAC credential.<\/p>\n<p>While this article focuses on vendor-neutral certs, you can learn what is available by specific vendors in our accompanying article in this series.<br \/>\nMore info: [url=http:\/\/searchsecurity.techtarget.com\/tip\/1,289483,sid14_gci935445,00.html]http:\/\/searchsecurity.techtarget.com\/tip\/1,289483,sid14_gci935445,00.html[\/url]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2472"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4959,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2472\/revisions\/4959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}