{"id":426,"date":"2013-08-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-08-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2013\/08\/09\/linux-gets-hit-by-a-trojan-its-time-to-sudo-apt-get-scared\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:17","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:17","slug":"linux-gets-hit-by-a-trojan-its-time-to-sudo-apt-get-scared","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2013\/08\/09\/linux-gets-hit-by-a-trojan-its-time-to-sudo-apt-get-scared\/","title":{"rendered":"Linux gets hit by a trojan &#8212; it&#8217;s time to sudo apt-get scared!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\">A big selling point of Linux-based operating systems are that they are generally immune to viruses, trojans and malware. However, this is a falsehood &#8212; no OS is 100 percent safe when it comes to these things. According to security company RSA, a team of Russian cyber-criminals have developed a trojan, named &#8220;Hand of Thief&#8221;, which targets Linux.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma; min-height: 11px;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\">The security company explains that the trojan is &#8220;designed to steal information from machines running the Linux OS. This malware is currently offered for sale in closed cybercrime communities for $2,000 USD (\u20ac1,500 EUR) with free updates. The current functionality includes form grabbers and backdoor capabilities, however, it&#8217;s expected that the Trojan will have a new suite of web injections and graduate to become full-blown banking malware in the very near future. At that point, the price is expected to rise to $3,000 USD (\u20ac2,250 EUR), plus a hefty $550 per major version release&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\">&#8220;The Trojan&#8217;s developer claims it has been tested on 15 different Linux desktop distributions, including Ubuntu, Fedora and Debian.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma; min-height: 11px;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\">While this trojan does seem nasty and scary, it is unlikely to spread easily given Linux users&#8217; propensity towards common-sense about installing software.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0px; text-align: justify; font-size: 9px; font-family: Tahoma;\">Link: <a href=\"http:\/\/betanews.com\/2013\/08\/09\/linux-gets-hit-by-a-trojan-its-time-to-sudo-apt-get-scared\/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed+-+bn+-+Betanews+Full+Content+Feed+-+BN\">http:\/\/betanews.com\/2013\/08\/09\/linux-gets-hit-by-a-trojan-its-time-to-sudo-apt-get-scared\/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed+-+bn+-+Betanews+Full+Content+Feed+-+BN<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-malware"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2913,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/426\/revisions\/2913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}