{"id":481,"date":"2003-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-11-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/11\/19\/iss-ships-first-proventia-g-intrusion-detection-device\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:26","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:26","slug":"iss-ships-first-proventia-g-intrusion-detection-device","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/11\/19\/iss-ships-first-proventia-g-intrusion-detection-device\/","title":{"rendered":"ISS Ships First Proventia G Intrusion Detection Device"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Internet Security Systems Monday shipped the first model in its Proventia G Series of intrusion prevention appliances that allows IT administrators to switch from active detection to passive intrusion prevention without disrupting their network&#8217;s traffic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The appliances, which are priced starting at $11,995, can detect and block both known and unknown attacks, said Internet Security Systems (ISS) executives, including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, worms, and Trojan horses.<\/p>\n<p>A third simulation mode lets IT managers report what it would have blocked had it been enabled, giving security staff a chance to test the accuracy of the appliance before putting it inline.<\/p>\n<p>More info: [url=http:\/\/www.crn.com\/sections\/BreakingNews\/dailyarchives.asp?ArticleID=46116]http:\/\/www.crn.com\/sections\/BreakingNews\/dailyarchives.asp?ArticleID=46116[\/url]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=481"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/481\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2968,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/481\/revisions\/2968"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}