{"id":507,"date":"2003-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-12-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/12\/18\/verisign-is-buying-managed-security-service-provider-guardent\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:30","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:30","slug":"verisign-is-buying-managed-security-service-provider-guardent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2003\/12\/18\/verisign-is-buying-managed-security-service-provider-guardent\/","title":{"rendered":"VeriSign is buying managed security service provider Guardent."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>VeriSign will pay about $140m in stock and cash for Guardent, while gaining about 150 full-time Guardent employees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;In addition to being a world-class company in its own right, Guardent is a perfect strategic fit,&#8221; said VeriSign chief executive officer Stratton Sclavos.  &#8220;By combining forces, we will solidify VeriSign&#8217;s leadership in network security,&#8221; he said, adding that with Guardent&#8217;s customer base, vulnerability management technology and security expertise, the merged company will be better able to serve customers.<\/p>\n<p>The acquisition, which is expected to close in the first quarter of next year, is subject to regulatory approvals and other conditions.<\/p>\n<p>More info: [url=http:\/\/www.computerweekly.com\/articles\/article.asp?liArticleID=127312&#038;liArticleTypeID=1&#038;liCategoryID=1&#038;liChannelID=13&#038;liFlavourID=1&#038;sSearch=&#038;nPage=1]http:\/\/www.computerweekly.com\/articles\/article.asp?liArticleID=127312&#038;liArticleTypeID=1&#038;liCategoryID=1&#038;liChannelID=13&#038;liFlavourID=1&#038;sSearch=&#038;nPage=1[\/url]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=507"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/507\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2994,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/507\/revisions\/2994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}