{"id":564,"date":"2004-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-09-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2004\/09\/23\/microsoft-changes-its-tune-on-porting-sp2-fixes\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:41","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:41","slug":"microsoft-changes-its-tune-on-porting-sp2-fixes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2004\/09\/23\/microsoft-changes-its-tune-on-porting-sp2-fixes\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft Changes Its Tune on Porting SP2 Fixes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft has been reticent to commit publicly to how, when and if it would make the browser-specific security fixes that it delivered as part of Windows XP Service Pack 2 available to users of older versions of Windows.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The decision: No SP2 fixes &#8212; not even ones like the SP2 pop-up blocker or the ActiveX-control blocker &#8212; will be offered for users of older versions of Windows and Internet Explorer (IE).<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft never publicly committed to providing any of the SP2 fixes for users of older versions of Windows or Internet Explorer.  But company officials privately told a select group of developers earlier this year of plans to port some of the IE-specific fixes to the version of IE 6 for Windows 2000 (Service Pack 5 update).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Trying to retrofit older technologies (which were never designed with current environment in mind) with current advancements creates a set of challenges that make it difficult for customers to deploy and doesn&#8217;t provide a level of security that we feel confident in providing to our customers.  Microsoft&#8217;s decision not to port SP2 fixes to Windows 2000, in particular, doesn&#8217;t sit well with Michael Cherry, senior analyst with the Kirkland, Wash.-based &#8220;Directions on Microsoft&#8221; research outfit.<\/p>\n<p>Is it &#8216;no&#8217; to improvements that could be part of Windows 2000 in a future SP before it leaves mainstream support?<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.microsoft-watch.com\/article2\/0,1995,1650707,00.asp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=564"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3051,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564\/revisions\/3051"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}