{"id":628,"date":"2005-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-02-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/02\/24\/china-walks-out-of-wireless-lan-security-talks\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:49","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:49","slug":"china-walks-out-of-wireless-lan-security-talks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/02\/24\/china-walks-out-of-wireless-lan-security-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"China Walks Out Of Wireless LAN Security Talks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China walked out of a wireless standards meeting this week, accusing the International Organization for Standardization of favoritism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The gambit came after China&#8217;s Wireless Authentication and Privacy Infrastructure (WAPI) security scheme was withdrawn and placed on a slower track by the ISO.  China initially agreed last year to refrain from making its WAPI security scheme mandatory for wireless LAN equipment in China.  It then approached ISO with a fast-track submission in an effort to make WAPI an international security standard.<\/p>\n<p>Until this week, the ISO group was focused on whether or not both 802.11i and WAPI should be cemented as enhanced &#8212; but optional &#8212; security standards.  However, sources said tempers flared when China&#8217;s original fast-track submission, designated 1N7506 of China National Standard GB15629.11 (WAPI), was withdrawn from consideration.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.networkingpipeline.com\/news\/60403249;jsessionid=F5FTSCKZCDLYAQSNDBCSKH0CJUMEKJVN<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=628"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3115,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/628\/revisions\/3115"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}