{"id":593,"date":"2004-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-11-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2004\/11\/29\/australia-e-mail-sms-voicemail-bugging-bill-passes\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:46","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:46","slug":"australia-e-mail-sms-voicemail-bugging-bill-passes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/?p=593","title":{"rendered":"Australia: E-mail, SMS, voicemail bugging Bill passes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Controversial legislation allowing law enforcement agencies to access e-mail, SMS and voicemail communications has passed parliament with Labor support.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Opposition justice spokesman Joe Ludwig had said Labor would support the Bill now that the government had undertaken to conduct a full review of the Telecommunications Interception Act.  <\/p>\n<p>But both the Australian Democrats and Greens continued to oppose the bill &#8211; the Telecommunications (Interception) Amendment (Stored Communications) Bill 2004 &#8211; on the grounds that it intruded excessively on privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Ludwig said the opposition would not oppose the bill on the basis that the government had accepted a bipartisan recommendation of a Senate committee which called for a comprehensive review of the Telecommunications Interception Act over the next 12 months.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats Senator Brian Greig said accessing private communications without a warrant and without the knowledge of the individual involved was a very intrusive practice.  &#8220;I don&#8217;t have confidence that that review is going to come from the point of view of the suggestions and enhancement of the rights of citizens from a government which has serially been involved in putting legislation to this place which cuts across the rights of citizens,&#8221; Senator Brown said.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.zdnet.com.au\/news\/security\/0,2000061744,39168307,00.htm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=593"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3080,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593\/revisions\/3080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}