{"id":650,"date":"2005-03-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-03-26T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2005\/03\/26\/industry-group-to-map-voip-security\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:37:53","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:37:53","slug":"industry-group-to-map-voip-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/?p=650","title":{"rendered":"Industry group to map VoIP security"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Voice over IP Security Alliance, a recently formed industry group, has created a new committee to define security requirements for Internet telephony networks.  The committee will define security requirements across a variety of voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) deployments and address issues such as security technology components, architecture and network design, network management, and end-point access and authentication, the group said Monday.  Another panel will research infrastructure weaknesses, vulnerabilities and emerging application attacks, the group said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The alliance was set up with the aim to generate public awareness and focus on best practices for security and privacy of Internet telephony networks.<\/p>\n<p>The alliance said membership of its technical board had risen to 50, with newer members including a McAfee division, MCI, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Samsung Telecommunications America, Sprint and VeriSign.<\/p>\n<p>Internet telephony, which is unregulated, is becoming popular due to cheap rates.  With this popularity have come fears of spam and viruses&#8211;a nuisance for Internet users&#8211;though there have been no major attacks as of yet on Net telephony.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/news.zdnet.com\/2100-1009_22-5643061.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=650"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/650\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3137,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/650\/revisions\/3137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}