{"id":760,"date":"2006-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/08\/first-results-from-cyber-security-standards\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:38:07","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:38:07","slug":"first-results-from-cyber-security-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/?p=760","title":{"rendered":"First results from Cyber Security Standards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The ISA Manufacturing and Control Systems Security standards committee has released the first and second parts of the ISA-99 series of standards for committee review and voting Note: Readers of the Editor&#8217;s free email newsletter will have read this news when it was announced.  &#8216;Our purpose is to establish standards that will define procedures for implementing electronically secure manufacturing and control systems and security practices and assessing electronic security performance,&#8217; said ISA-SP99 chairman Bryan Singer of Rockwell Automation.   The ISA-SP99 committee addresses industrial automation and control systems whose compromise could result in any or all of the following: impact on national security, endangerment of the public or employees, loss of proprietary or confidential information, violation of regulatory requirements, and economic loss.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The ISA-99 Part 1 standard, &#8216;Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems: Concepts, Terminology and Models,&#8217; will define the concepts, terminology, and models of industrial automation and control systems security, establishing the basis for the remaining standards in the ISA-99 series.<\/p>\n<p>The ISA-99 Part 2 standard, &#8216;Establishing an Industrial Automation and Control Systems Security Programme&#8217;, will provide guidance for developing a programme for the security of industrial automation and control systems.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.processingtalk.com\/news\/isa\/isa215.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=760"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/760\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3247,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/760\/revisions\/3247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}