{"id":770,"date":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php\/2006\/05\/19\/researchers-spend-to-protect-against-one-attack-not-many\/"},"modified":"2021-12-30T11:38:08","modified_gmt":"2021-12-30T11:38:08","slug":"researchers-spend-to-protect-against-one-attack-not-many","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/?p=770","title":{"rendered":"Researchers: spend to protect against one attack, not many"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In an academic paper to be presented next month at the University of Cambridge in England, a research team will make a compelling and somewhat surprising mathematical case for how enterprises should spend their IT security budgets.  The three researchers, from the Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton, looked at how companies can evaluate their vulnerabilities, analyze the risk and calculate the potential for damage.  Rather than spending evenly to guard against all attacks, it&#8217;s not necessarily the right approach if one kind of breach could cause many times more damage than another kind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The paper, called &#8220;Economics of Information Security Investment in the Case of Simultaneous Attacks&#8221; breaks threats into two categories: distributed attacks, which come in the form of virus, spyware and spam, and targeted attacks from a hacker, said professor Qing Hu.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;No matter how much they spend on security, the budget is always low relative to the potential loss,&#8221; Huang said.  <\/p>\n<p>Targeted attacks have generally been shown to cause more financial damage than distributed attacks.<\/p>\n<p>For enterprises, &#8220;we&#8217;ve gone past the time when people just attacked us as a game,&#8221; Behara said.<\/p>\n<p>Huang and Hu will present the paper at the University of Cambridge during the Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, which runs from June 26 to June 28.<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/infoworld.com\/article\/06\/05\/19\/78509_HNholesinapproach_1.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=770"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/770\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3257,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/770\/revisions\/3257"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybersecurityinstitute.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}