Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: Trends

Hackers haunting Europe now

Posted on November 30, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Moreover, the successful hacking and distributed denial of service attacks now originate from Brazil, Russia, China and India, the mi2g Intelligence Unit reported in new research. The combined number of attacks — 5,682 — against the European countries far exceeds the overt digital attacks recorded against the United States (3,696) and Canada (209). Brazil, with 962 attacks, Turkey (549) and China (317) are the only non-Western countries in the top 10.

The mi2g report found that 55 per cent of all digital attacks in November were launched against small entities with a turnover below $7-million (U.S.). Only 1 per cent of all successful digital attacks in November were against larger entities with a turnover in excess of $40-million.

In terms of operating systems, Linux remained the most popular among hackers, according to mi2G, reflecting how popular Linux has become as a platform for Internet-connected computers and servers. Systems running the open-source system accounted for 61.7 per cent of all attacks. Microsoft Windows followed with 23.7 per cent.

But since most government computers run Microsoft systems, Windows servers in governmental operations registered a record high of 84.1 per cent of all successful digital attacks.

The mi2g report also estimated worldwide economic damage from hacker attacks, DDoS attacks, as well as virus, worm and spam proliferation at $166.7-billion to $203.75-billion, with the greatest damage coming from malware and spam.

More info: [url=http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031128.gthacknov28/BNStory/Technology/]http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031128.gthacknov28/BNStory/Technology/[/url]

Read more

Future virus fighting

Posted on November 26, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

In general, an unknown writer identifies a vulnerability in a common system, writes software to exploit it and releases it to his chums and the antivirus companies, sometimes into the wild. The virus is analysed, a unique pattern within it is identified and the antivirus companies release the update to their customers.

One approach to counter that is heuristic analysis, where software examines email attachments and incoming files and attempts to work out what they actually do. A more advanced form of heuristic scanning involves running the code, either in emulation or a virtual machine, and watching for dangerous activity.

Yet another approach is to monitor not the suspect code, but the entry points to the operating system: as software runs, the antivirus program constantly checks for dangerous activity.

One of the latest demonstrations comes from Washington University, where John Lockwood and his students have developed a device called the Field Programmable Port Extender (FPX) that can scan incoming bitstreams at up to 2.4 gigabits per second. The hardware builds incoming packets into a message, analyses the protocol headers and compares the contents of the message against a database of known signatures — all things that are normally done in software.

More info: [url=http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020415,39118047,00.htm]http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020415,39118047,00.htm[/url]

Read more

Firms Wep up security nightmare

Posted on November 26, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

The research found 28 per cent of firms have implemented wireless infrastructures, while 40 per cent plan to do so by 2005, using Wep as the security standard rather than technologies such as virtual private networks.

“Security is still a concern, but the biggest danger isn’t enterprise deployment but deployment by an end-user,” he said.

Mike Smart, European product manager at SonicWall, said: “Relying on Wep or banning wireless usage is not enough to guarantee network integrity.”

More info: [url=http://www.vnunet.com/News/1150021]http://www.vnunet.com/News/1150021[/url]

Read more

Half Of Companies Surveyed Suffered Security Breach

Posted on November 25, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

“Earlier this year, we saw the security budgets in large organization increasing,” said Mark Lobel, the senior manager for security and privacy services at PricewaterhouseCoopers, and the author of the survey results.

“But we’re seeing these fast-growing companies not spending as consistently as their more mature brethren.

According to the survey, 46 percent of the fast-growing companies polled said they had been the victim of a recent security breach.

Hackers were cited as the source of 61 percent of the attacks, followed by e-mail at 27 percent.

Attacks by unauthorized users and employees, former employees, and competitors, however, accounted for more than 1 out of every 10 attacks.

Of those companies which admitted to a security breach, 83 percent reported at least some monetary loss — ranging from network downtime and lost or damaged customer records to direct financial losses and identity theft.

More info: [url=http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20031124S0008]http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20031124S0008[/url]

Read more

IT security spending by Asia to grow sharply: IDC

Posted on November 22, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Singapore’s security solutions market is forecast to expand at a five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.2% to reach over US$430 million by 2007, said IT research house IDC in a statement.

Spending on security solutions in Asia Pacific, excluding Japan, is estimated to hit US$1.7b this year and grow 25 percent yearly to US$4.1b in 2007, IDC said.

Countries such as Australia, Korea, China will constitute the largest share of the security solutions market in terms of market value and actual spending, according to IDC.

More info: [url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/technologynews/view/58545/1html]http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/technologynews/view/58545/1html[/url]

Read more

Worms of the future

Posted on November 19, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

In the end, what is left and what could be done as an emergency measure? I’m afraid there’s not much that can be done to approach 100% efficiency.

Probably one of the most promising security measures would be traffic shaping IDSes and communication between different ones. They still need a lot of improvement to prevent false positives, because false positives tend to bore administrators who then end up not listening to alerts anymore.

Full disclosure of vulnerabilities is surely a way of facilitating the task of exploit writing. On the other hand, imposing a total blackout on vulnerability discovery and disclosing it only to the vendor (or publisher) of a piece of software is surely a way of; 1- not inciting hackers to discover holes, and 2-having some hackers keep them for their group of friends to carry out their own exploits.

Good old solution: patch, patch, patch
Last word: patching a system as soon as a solution has been found to a security vulnerability has always been the best solution to avoid security problems.

More info: http[url=http://www.net-security.org/dl/articles/wf.pdf]://www.net-security.org/dl/articles/wf.pdf[/url]

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Security Operations Weekly — July 19, 2026
  • Security Operations Weekly — July 19, 2026 — Interactive Topic Map
  • DevSecOps Weekly — July 19, 2026

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • AI-Ops
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme