Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Category: News

Army defense task force targeting hackers

Posted on October 28, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

The document, produced in August for the Pentagon’s department for acquisition, technology and logistics and first reported last week by Inside Defense, says that the task force will also address the fact that the increasing use of non-U.S.

A report last year from the Defense Science Board warned that the globalization of the supply chain, with software for high-technology systems increasingly developed outside the United States, created targets for unfriendly countries or other U.S. adversaries.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/27/army-defense-task-force-targeting-hackers/

Read more

Ethernet data center standards still evolving

Posted on October 21, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Even though strides are being made to define standards for extending Ethernet to handle data center applications, these advances will not be a panacea, according to vendors. Indeed, proprietary extensions to those standards, which are being defined by the IEEE and the Technical Committee T11 of the InterNational Committee for Information Technology Standards, will still be required to address customer requirements for data center-optimized Ethernet. Additionally, vendor marketing may confuse the issue even more as some have adopted different acronymic brands that essentially refer to the same technology.

A group of vendors is driving standards for Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE), an extended version of Ethernet for data center applications. Cisco participates in the CEE standards efforts, though refers to the technology as Data Center Ethernet (DCE).

A new kind of Ethernet CEE and DCE describe an enhanced Ethernet that will enable convergence of LAN, storage-area network and high-performance computing applications in data centers onto a single Ethernet interconnect fabric. Currently, these applications have separate interconnect technologies, including Fibre Channel, InfiniBand and Myrinet. This forces users and server vendors to support multiple interconnects to attach servers to the various networks, a situation that is costly, energy and operationally inefficient and difficult to manage.

So, many in the industry — including Brocade, EMC, NetApp, Emulex, Fujitsu, IBM, Intel, Sun Microsystems and Woven Systems, in addition to Cisco and Force10 — are proposing Ethernet as a single, unified interconnect fabric for the data center. These vendors point to its ubiquity, familiarity, cost and speed advances: 10Gbit/sec. But in its current state, Ethernet is not optimized to provide the service required for storage and high-performance computing traffic — speed alone won’t cut it, vendors said.

Ethernet, which drops packets when traffic congestion occurs, needs to evolve into a low- latency, “lossless” transport technology with congestion management and flow control features, according to backers. “You need to make sure Ethernet will behave in the same way as Fibre Channel itself,” said Claudio DeSanti, a technical leader in Cisco’s storage technology group. DeSanti is vice chair of T11 and technical editor of the IEEE’s 802.1Qbb priority-based flow control project within the Data Center Bridging (DCB) task group.

T11’s FCoE defines the mapping of Fibre Channel frames over Ethernet so storage traffic can be converged onto a 10Gbit/sec. The IEEE’s DCB task force is defining three standards — 802.1Qau for congestion notification, Qaz for enhanced transmission selection and Qbb for priority-based flow control. Where Ethernet standards fall short Vendors said these standards should be solid enough to implement in products and deploy in data centers by late 2009 or early 2010. The DCB standards will be final in March 2010, four months later than initially planned because of some outstanding but not insurmountable issues, according to Pat Thaler, chair of the DCB task group in the IEEE.

But some leading-edge customers need a pre-standard lossless Ethernet implementation now, vendors said; and even when these standards are complete they will be incomplete, others pointed out. “A particular area where we feel these standards don’t really address is the avoidance of congestion — primarily with respect to load-balancing traffic first before we rate limit traffic at the source,” said Bert Tanaka, vice president of engineering at Woven Systems. “They are really targeted for a fairly small fabric — maybe hundreds of nodes,” he said. “But if you’re trying to scale to multiple hops and larger fabrics, it’s not clear it would scale to something like that.”

Apart from the standards efforts, CEE and DCE may raise some operational challenges, according to Chuck Hollis, EMC’s global marketing chief technology officer.

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9117639&source=NLT_PM&nlid=8

Read more

U.S. proposes digital signing of DNS root zone file

Posted on October 10, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

The operator of the .org TLD has also committed to the system, according to the Commerce Department.

But to get the full benefits of DNSSEC requires domain name registrars, domain name registries, Internet service providers and others to upgrade their software. “DNSSEC-signed root zone would represent one of most significant changes to the DNS infrastructure since it was created,” according to a notice issued by the Commerce Department in the Federal Register, a daily digest of U.S. government notices.

As it stands now, TLD operators send changes to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, which is part of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. ICANN then sends the changes to the U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which is part of the Commerce Department. The heavy involvement of the U.S. government in how the Internet’s addressing system is administered, as well as the interests of VeriSign, has drawn criticism that the process is too U.S.-centric. And there appears to be a battle brewing over which entity will manage the cryptographic keys required to sign the root zone file.

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9116900&source=NLT_PM&nlid=8

Read more

New Protocols Secure Layer 2

Posted on October 5, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

802.1AE is a completed standard and will be appearing soon in hardware.

Organizations have the option of encrypting frames that traverse the wire, but in theory, there are few reasons not to encrypt. We say “in theory” because of the potential performance impact encryption has on switch capacity and delay.

The default encryption algorithm, AES-GCM, will require a hardware upgrade in network infrastructure and host network interface cards. 802.1AE implementations must conform to performance characteristics defined in the standard.

The downside is that any products that transparently process network traffic, like load balancers, traffic shapers, and network analyzers, will be blind to 802.1AE-protected traffic.

802.1X-REV builds on 802.1X to support features like authentication of multiple devices on a single switch port and key distribution for 802.1AE devices. Rather than manually creating and installing keys in network devices, 802.1X-REV makes key management part of the protocol in a fashion similar to 802.11i or WPA/WPA2.

Many organizations’ physical wiring has one physical LAN port per desk or cubicle, and 802.1X on a wired network was originally designed to be deployed on a one-host-per-port basis. However, it’s now common for sites to have multiple hosts per port. For example, voice-over-IP phones have their own LAN port to plug into a desktop or laptop, which means two network devices per port. Recognizing this is a problem, switch vendors provide workarounds such as allowing one unauthenticated device to be placed on a specific virtual LAN, but a subsequent device has to authenticate before getting access to the network. Cisco allows its Cisco Discover Protocol to pass through an 802.1X port, which allows discovered devices to access a designated VLAN. Switches such as the HP ProCurve allow multiple hosts to authenticate, and the switch creates virtual ports based on a device’s MAC address and authentication state. If a workstation is connected to a VoIP phone and was properly authenticated, someone could simply clone the workstation’s MAC address and connect to the network through that VoIP phone.

If your company is in the planning stages of a switch upgrade, it might be a good idea to put off deploying the access layer until your chosen vendor supports 802.1AE and 802.1X-REV. Like all encryption technologies, 802.1AE will have an impact on network design.

Switches can send duplicate frames to a mirror port on a switch so that packet analyzers and intrusion-detection systems can process the frames, but that is not a perfect solution. For example, a full-duplex 1-Gbps link is capable of sending and receiving 1 Gbps simultaneously, for a total capacity of 2 Gbps.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/infrastructure/ethernet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210605169

Read more

IT security fears snarl business innovation

Posted on October 2, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

“Today’s businesses cannot grow in the absence of a healthy environment for the realization of new innovations,” said IDC Vice President Chris Christiansen in a prepared statement.

· And, creating a repeatable process for making risk/reward calculations for new initiatives.

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/online/IT-Asset-and-Technology-Centers/IT-security-fears-snarl-business-innovation/17857SIW364

Read more

Secure Computing Unveils Cyber Security Initiative

Posted on October 2, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Secure Computing is used by the world’s most demanding customers to virtually eliminate risks from cyber attacks, espionage or sabotage that may cause loss of life, property, economic loss and disruption or create devastating environmental disasters.

Timed in conjunction with the fifth annual National Cyber Security Awareness (NCSA) Month in October, Secure Computing’s Cyber Security Initiative kicks-off an intensive effort to provide corporations with informative research, tools, technologies, solutions and best practices vital for companies and federal agencies evaluating–or re-evaluating–their approach to critical infrastructure protection. Critical infrastructure comprises all computer systems that can be targets of criminal threats, industrial espionage and/or politically motivated sabotage such as the power grid, water supply, railways, nuclear energy plants and more.
Attacks on such networks can cause loss of life, threaten public safety, impact national security, or create economic upheaval or environmental disaster. It is estimated that the destruction from a single wave of cyber attacks on U.S. critical infrastructures can exceed $700 billion USD — the equivalent of 50 major hurricanes hitting U.S. soil at once.

“Even though businesses and government agencies know they need to secure their networks, many don’t have the in-house expertise or time it takes to fully secure systems,” explained Scott Montgomery, vice president of Global Technical Strategy for Secure Computing. “We want to elevate awareness so that they understand how to change behavior to make security a high priority.” In the industries where security is paramount and network-to-network interconnection is the norm, security is not an option…it is a necessity.

With a unique combination of high-speed application layer defenses, reputation scores, geo-location control, and long history of no patches or hacks, Secure Computing can defend critical networks without jeopardizing their core functionality and availability requirements. Security is needed to protect key aspects of the network: the control system assets themselves and information about critical assets. A major urban utility company servicing over 10 million customers purchased Secure Computing’s Secure Firewall (previously known as Sidewinder) 14 years ago to protect their control network.

The data and resulting analysis will be published on the website mid-October.

http://www.ebizq.net/news/10350.html

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • …
  • 145
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Security Operations Weekly — July 26, 2026
  • Security Operations Weekly — July 26, 2026 — Interactive Topic Map
  • IT/OT Security Weekly — July 26, 2026

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • AI-Ops
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • Competitive
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • IT/OT Security
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2026 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme