Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Newsalert – 2015 Apr 21

Posted on April 21, 2015December 30, 2021 by admini

**Pushdo spamming botnet gains strength again**
Computers in more than 50 countries are infected with a new version of Pushdo, a spamming botnet that has been around since 2007 and survived several attempts to shut it down.
The latest version has been pushing Fareit, which is malware that steals login credentials, and Cutwail, a spam engine module. It has also been used to distribute online banking menaces such as Dyre and Zeus.
Using an elaborate algorithm, the secondary system generates 30 domains names a day that an infected computer can try to contact, according to an advisory on Fidelis’s blog. Fidelis reverse-engineered the algorithm that generates those domain names, allowing it to register some of the domains.
**Link:** [ http://www.itworld.com/article/2912535/pushdo-spamming-botnet-gains-strength-again.html#tk.rss_news ] ( http://www.itworld.com/article/2912535/pushdo-spamming-botnet-gains-strength-again.html#tk.rss_news )

**Study Uncovers Fears of Potential Domino Effect from Cyberattacks**
RedSeal (redseal.co) unveiled its comprehensive survey of high-ranking executives that vividly illustrates widespread concern regarding the potential effects of cyberattacks in corporate America. Most of the C-level professionals surveyed readily acknowledge that a coordinated assault launched by sophisticated cybercriminals would wreak ongoing havoc on business operations, cause considerable harm to a brand, and potentially affect related companies, even entire industries. In addition, many also point out that in the networked economy, containing the problems caused by a sustained network attack will be very difficult. In fact, a major network disruption at a single company or network can easily disrupt or even wreak havoc on a local, state, national and even global level.
The vast majority of the executives surveyed, 74%, acknowledge that cyberattacks on networks of U.S. organizations can cause “serious damage or disruption,” and most of the rest, 21%, admit to fears of “significant damage or disruption.” More specifically, almost 80% admit that such attacks can inflict “serious impacts to business profitability and growth,” and bring about “serious brand damage.” A large number, 45%, also related personnel concerns, saying such events will lead to a “big hit on employee productivity.” More than 43% also predict business downtime, while more than 41% fear “internal/organizational disruption or chaos.”
In fact, the idea of a domino effect—one successful attack on one network leading directly to attacks on different networks in diverse but connected sectors of the economy—clearly resonated strongly with the executives surveyed. More than half the respondents, 52%, singled out “defense systems” as being potentially affected by a cyber-criminal incident or data breach, while 45% cited “border security.” And taking a big picture approach, a significant 59% said such attacks will take their toll on “economic security.”
Link: [ http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/study-uncovers-fears-of-potential-domino-effect-from-cyberattacks/d/d-id/1320053 ] (http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/study-uncovers-fears-of-potential-domino-effect-from-cyberattacks/d/d-id/1320053 )

**Investment Advisers: Six Areas of Focus for SEC Cybersecurity Exams**
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in an effort to consistently reinforce its expectations in the area of cyber risk management, last year issued a cybersecurity-dedicated Risk Alert, as well as other communications to address the growing number and complexity of cybersecurity risks facing investment advisers (IAs). The alert, issued by the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE)¹, highlights the SEC’s cybersecurity initiative, including a sweep of more than 50 registered IAs and broker-dealers focusing on cybersecurity.²
he alert also provides a sample document request that lists six primary areas that the OCIE plans to evaluate during cybersecurity exams and the processes and controls examiners expect IAs to have in place to address threats, including those related to networks and information, remote customer access and vendors and other third parties.
**Link:** [ http://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2015/04/21/investment-advisers-six-areas-of-focus-for-sec-cybersecurity-exams-3/ ] ( http://deloitte.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2015/04/21/investment-advisers-six-areas-of-focus-for-sec-cybersecurity-exams-3/ )

**U.S. plans a cybersecurity center in Silicon Valley**
The center will function as a satellite office of the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC), a day-and-night operation that acts as an information and threat clearing house for government and private entities.
**Link:** [ http://www.computerworld.com/article/2912468/cybercrime-hacking/us-plans-a-cybersecurity-center-in-silicon-valley.html?phint=newt%3Dcomputerworld_dailynews&phint=idg_eid%3Dd5d8326c323742a4ed7bf4fd3dac54c4#tk.CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2015-04-21&siteid=&phint=tpcs%3D&phint=idg_eid%3Dd5d8326c323742a4ed7bf4fd3dac54c4 ] ( http://www.computerworld.com/article/2912468/cybercrime-hacking/us-plans-a-cybersecurity-center-in-silicon-valley.html?phint=newt%3Dcomputerworld_dailynews&phint=idg_eid%3Dd5d8326c323742a4ed7bf4fd3dac54c4#tk.CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2015-04-21&siteid=&phint=tpcs%3D&phint=idg_eid%3Dd5d8326c323742a4ed7bf4fd3dac54c4 )

**New fileless malware found in the wild**
Since the discovery of the Poweliks fileless Trojan in August 2014, researchers have been expecting other similar malware to pop up.
The wait over: Phasebot malware, which also has fileless infection as part of its routine, is being sold online.
Phasebot seems to be a direct successor of Solarbot.
Its detection evasion tactics include rootkit capabilities, encryption of communications with its C&C server by using random passwords, virtual machine detection.
**Link:** [ http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=3021 ] ( http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=3021 )

**”Buhtrap” Malware Targeting Russian Banks And Businesses**
ESET has discovered a malware campaign targeting Russian banks and the accounting departments of Russian businesses, nicknamed Operation Buhtrap. Apparently, the malware has been active for more than a year, and 88 percent of the attacks have been in Russia and 10 percent in the Ukraine.
Analysts at ESET uncovered CVE-2012-0158 late in 2014, which is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the ListView/TreeView Active X controls found in the MSCOMCTL.OCX library. The malicious code can be activated using a specially modified DOC or RTF file for MS Office 2003, 2007, or 2010, according to Security Affairs.
**Link:** [ http://www.bsminfo.com/doc/buhtrap-malware-targeting-russian-banks-businesses-0001 ] ( http://www.bsminfo.com/doc/buhtrap-malware-targeting-russian-banks-businesses-0001 )

**Lieberman Software’s Security Double-Tap(TM) Defeats Golden Ticket Cyber Attacks**
LOS ANGELES, CA–(Marketwired – April 21, 2015) – Lieberman Software Corporation today announced Security Double-Tap, a solution to block the destructive Golden Ticket cyber attack. This new feature is included in Enterprise Random Password Manager™ (ERPM) — the company’s privilege management platform — and is being exhibited for the first time at RSA Conference 2015 in San Francisco, CA.
Today’s enterprises are under assault from sophisticated cyber attacks like pass-the-hash (PTH) and pass-the-ticket (PTT). These advanced persistent threats — at the core of some of the most notorious recent data breaches — operate at nearly a 100% success rate. While PTH is a more widely known threat, the related PTT attack is just as dangerous. PTT attacks target Kerberos, the default authentication protocol in Windows domains.
ERPM now provides an automated double password reset specifically designed to combat the Golden Ticket attack. The two password resets — a Security Double-Tap — force rapid replication of the changed credentials throughout the domain, to block the use of compromised accounts. In conjunction with this process, ERPM can also force an automatic chained reboot of target system to clear memory of hashes and passwords, and prevent memory scraping.
**Link:** [ http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/21/idUSnMKWDwJzFa+1ea+MKW20150421 ] ( http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/21/idUSnMKWDwJzFa+1ea+MKW20150421 )

**RSA supremo rips ‘failed’ security industry a new backdoor, warns of ‘super-mega hack’**
RSA 2015 RSA president Amit Yoran tore into the infosec industry today, telling 30,000 attendees at this year’s RSA computer security conference that they have failed.
He said security bods should drop “legacy approaches” that have led to a false sense of security. Such approaches are akin to building “higher walls” and “deeper moats,” which will not help address the shortcomings in security.
**Link:** [ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/21/rsa_boss_rips_failed_security_industry/ ] ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/21/rsa_boss_rips_failed_security_industry/ )

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme