Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=mail=3Dpaulgdavis.com@mail57.atl71.mcdlv.net;

Posted on September 11, 2016December 30, 2021 by admini

[From the desk of Paul Davis – his opinions and no-one else’s]
Apart from the reporter’s opinions 😉
So onto the news:

Cisco Midyear Security Report Reveals Sophisticated Cyberattacks Are Defining the Innovation Race Between Adversaries and Defenders

The Cisco® (NASDAQ: CSCO) 2015 Midyear Security Report released today, which analyzes threat intelligence and cybersecurity trends, reveals the critical need for organizations to reduce time to detection (TTD) in order to remediate against sophisticated attacks by highly motivated threat actors. The Angler Exploit Kit represents the types of common threats that will challenge organizations as the digital economy and the Internet of Everything (IoE) create new attack vectors and monetization opportunities for adversaries.

The report shows that new risks associated with Flash, the evolution of ransomware, and the Dridex mutating malware campaign, reinforce the need for reduced time to detection. With the digitization of business and the IoE, malware and threats become even more pervasive, which shines a light on the security industry’s estimates of 100 to 200 days for TTD. In contrast, the average TTD for Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP), with its retrospective analysis of attacks that make it past existing defenses, is 46 hours.

The findings also underscore the need for businesses to deploy integrated solutions vs. point products, work with trustworthy vendors, and enlist security services providers for guidance and assessment. Further, geopolitical experts have declared that a global cyber governance framework is needed to sustain economic growth.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=47cbeefeba&e=20056c7556

Elastica Cloud Threat Labs Discovers Google Drive-Based Phishing CampaignElastica Cloud Threat Labs Discovers Google Drive-Based Phishing Campaign

SAN JOSE, CA–(Marketwired – Jul 27, 2015) – Elastica (www.elastica.net), the leader in Data Science Powered™ Cloud Application Security, today released findings around a new Google Drive-based advanced phishing campaign initiated by unknown attackers. The attackers used JavaScript code obfuscation and compromised websites in order to steal end-user account credentials using Google services. A detailed analysis of the attack can be found on the Elastica Cloud Threat Labs blog.

According to Elastica researchers, the attackers deployed a JavaScript encoding mechanism to obfuscate Web page code that could not be easily read. Attackers were able to reach a wider network of end users by exploiting a widely used and highly trusted enterprise tool such as Google Drive to host malicious Web pages, where attack victims were directed. In this case, the attackers used Gmail to distribute emails containing links to unauthorized Web pages hosted on Google Drive, and then stored stolen credentials through a third-party domain.

Though researchers are uncertain whether the Gmail account was compromised or if attackers created a false account, the phishing emails were delivered successfully and undetected by Google’s built-in spam engine. This is most likely because the emails were sent from what appeared to be an authentic Google account and the embedded link pointed to “googledrive.com.”

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=fab313a8ab&e=20056c7556

Busting cybersecurity jargon: 20 need-to-know terms to protect your enterprise

Do you know what a detection deficit is? Do you know the difference between a malware and crimeware? These cybersecurity terms might not mean much to you now, but when your enterprise organization is faced with a potential data breach (and it’s typically not a matter of if you get breached, but when), you will want to be able to understand what’s going on.

To help, here are 20 key cybersecurity terms that you should know to secure your enterprise systems.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=227a1b40b1&e=20056c7556

Software vulnerabilities hit a record high in 2014, report says

There was some worrying news in the recent Secunia Vulnerability Review 2015. The number of recorded vulnerabilities hit a record high of 15,435 last year, up 18% from 2013. The vulnerability count has increased 55% in the last five years. The report also found a rise in the number of zero-day vulnerabilities with 20 being uncovered in the 50 most popular programs. These are vulnerabilities that have already been exploited by hackers before being made public or being patched.

It seems that many businesses are making dangerous assumptions about open source software. The Ninth Annual Future of Open Source Survey from Black Duck offers some fascinating insights. OSS is gaining in popularity quite dramatically, but there’s a lack of policy in place to manage it. An impressive 78% of respondents reported that their companies run part or all of their operations on OSS, but 55% have no formal policy in place to deal with OSS use.

There’s a belief that OSS delivers better security than proprietary software, as 55% of respondents cited security as a reason for adopting OSS. That may be true, but it doesn’t mean that OSS is free of vulnerabilities. We all remember Heartbleed, and OpenSSL just released a fix for another high-severity flaw. It takes time and resources just to stay up to date on the latest vulnerabilities and keep software fully patched.

According to the survey, more than 50% of respondents are not satisfied with their ability to understand known security vulnerabilities in open-source components. What’s worse – only 17% plan to monitor open source code for security vulnerabilities. That means the majority are content to rely on someone else to find vulnerabilities, and without oversight it’s hard to predict how many vulnerabilities are already being exploited.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=deb9e0bdc7&e=20056c7556

============================================================
Feedback, questions? Our mailing address is: ** dailynews@paulgdavis.com (mailto:dailynews@paulgdavis.com)

If someone forwarded this email to you and you want to be added in,
please click this: ** Subscribe to this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a)

** Unsubscribe from this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556&c=2fbb9f3ebc)

** Update subscription preferences (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/profile?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme