Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: November 2003

Conqueror Worm?

Posted on November 6, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Last week’s elevated warning levels surrounding MiMail.C, a new, fast-spreading worm, gave IT departments time to brace themselves for a new round of attacks–but only barely.

The arrival of this new family of worms is not without attendant irony: MiMail.C arrived just as SoBig finally lost its spot at the top of the “Most Popular Virus” heap.

MiMail may or may not achieve a similar “status,” but the time between first deployment and release of refined versions spanned just a couple of months.

But those vendors–and all IT security professionals, for that matter–face an ongoing challenge of shortening the time between detection, alert announcement, and effective prevention and/or removal tools.

More info: [url=http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=Z2SCZM2ERD0ASQSNDBGCKHY?articleId=16000158]http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=Z2SCZM2ERD0ASQSNDBGCKHY?articleId=16000158[/url]

Read more

Users look to redefine security approach

Posted on November 6, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

In a presentation to the RSA Security Conference in Amsterdam, members of the Royal Mail, ICI and BT Global Services outlined their position on what defines a secure network and how they want to see it achieved.

“This isn’t pushing for a new BS7799 standard or anything,” said Paul Simmonds, global information security director at chemical manufacturer ICI.

The eventual goal is to shift the security market away from trying to keep networks pure from outside influences with a hardened perimeter, and concentrate on securing data access and enabling more business-to-business secure traffic.

He described Microsoft’s Rights Management Services (RMS) as interesting, but said that an ideal solution would see documents passed over a variety of operating systems and computing environments without sacrificing any degree of confidentiality.

Cisco has already been contacted and other large IT vendors are on the target list.

More info: [url=http://www.vnunet.com/News/1147499]http://www.vnunet.com/News/1147499[/url]

Read more

Brazil police bust gang of Internet hackers

Posted on November 6, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

The operation, dubbed “Trojan Horse” and involving 205 officers, targetted a gang that stole more than $10 million last year by breaking into banks and clients computers, federal police said in a statement.

Police said the gang had created Internet sites and programs capable of uncovering the passwords of clients who transferred money on the Web.

Once the gang obtained the passwords, funds were stolen electronically from accounts and transferred to other bank accounts held in the names of third persons.

More info: [url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=269501]http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=269501[/url]

Read more

Hackers in attack on Scottish credit card firm

Posted on November 6, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

WorldPay, which is part of Edinburgh-based Royal Bank of Scotland Group, said it had been bombarded with millions of bogus e-mails in the past couple of days, which had left the firm struggling to deal with genuine payments.

The bulk of its clients are located in the UK and mainland Europe, and payment requests from websites are normally sent in via e-mail.

The firm said a massive number of messages from elsewhere had come in to the same address over a 24-hour period.

As a result, transaction requests have either crashed or been slowed down.

However, it appears those behind the e-mails – which originate in the Ukraine – have set out to disrupt business rather than attempt to commit fraud.

At the start of this year, Visa and Mastercard admitted a hacker had gained access to more than five million credit card accounts.

More recently, net provider PSINet and security firm PanSec International said an unprotected website they set up as part of a study was attacked about 2000 times a week over a two-month period.

More info: [url=http://www.edinburghnews.com/business.cfm?id=1224512003]http://www.edinburghnews.com/business.cfm?id=1224512003[/url]

Read more

Wireless Update Rollup Package for Windows XP is Available

Posted on November 5, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Microsoft has released an update rollup package for Microsoft Windows XP that includes the hotfixes and updates that are described in the following list. More info: [url=http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=815485]http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=815485[/url]

Read more

Wireless Intrusion Detection Systems

Posted on November 5, 2003December 30, 2021 by admini

Security issues ranging from misconfigured wireless access points (WAPs) to session hijacking to Denial of Service (DoS) can plague a WLAN.

Wireless networks are not only susceptible to TCP/IP-based attacks native to wired networks, they are also subject to a wide array of 802.11-specific threats.

The standard 802.11 encryption method, Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) is weak.

Rogue WAPs can also be introduced by users.

The point is that the threats are real, they can cause extensive damage, and they are becoming more prevalent as the 802.11 technology grows in popularity.

Without some sort of detection mechanism, it can be difficult to identify the threats to a WLAN.

Traditional wired based Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) attempt to identify computer system and network intrusions and misuse by gathering and analyzing data.

More recently, IDSs have been developed for use on wireless networks. These wireless IDSs can monitor and analyze user and system activities, recognize patterns of known attacks, identify abnormal network activity, and detect policy violations for WLANs.

Wireless IDSs gather all local wireless transmissions and generate alerts based either on predefined signatures or on anomalies in the traffic. A Wireless IDS is similar to a standard, wired IDS, but has additional deployment requirements as well as some unique features specific to WLAN intrusion and misuse detection.

A centralized wireless IDS is usually a combination of individual sensors which collect and forward all 802.11 data to a central management system, where the wireless IDS data is stored and processed.

[url=http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1742]http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1742[/url]

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme