Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: February 2004

MyDoom downs SCO site

Posted on February 1, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The attack began Saturday night and by Sunday morning the software firm’s site was completely flooded with requests, Utah-based SCO said.

While infected PCs were supposed to start inundating the main SCO Web site with data starting at 4:09 pm GMT (8:09 am PST), the site had been nearly inaccessible for a 16-hour period prior to the scheduled start of the attack, according to Internet performance measurement firm Netcraft. The outage could have been due to a large number of infected computers having their clocks set to the wrong time.

“This is the biggest single (denial of service) attack ever,” Mikko Hypponen, director of antivirus research at F-Secure, wrote in an update on the security company’s Web site. In its statement on Sunday, SCO it still “had a series of contingency plans to deal with this problem,” but would wait until Monday–at about 5 a.m. PST–to communicate them.

The attack aimed at Microsoft by computers infected with the B variant of MyDoom is not expected to have as much effect because that version hasn’t spread as widely, said Vincent Weafer, a senior director at computer-security company Symantec.

More info: [url=http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5151572.html]http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5151572.html[/url]

Read more

BANK GROUP OFFERS GUIDELINES ON OUTSOURCING SECURITY RISKS

Posted on February 1, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The Banking Industry Technology Secretariat (BITS) in Washington released the security guidelines as an addendum to an existing framework for managing business relationships with IT services providers. The group’s goal is to help financial services firms streamline the outsourcing evaluation process and better manage the risks of handing over control of key corporate systems to vendors.

The guidelines are based on the International Standards Organization’s ISO 17799 code of practice for information security management, which covers categories such as documenting corporate security policies and classifying assets. They also include best practices gathered from BITS members and input from vendors, government agencies and third-party IT auditors, said Faith Boettger, a senior consultant at BITS.

Bob Cedergren, second vice president of information security and business continuity planning at Fortis Inc., a financial services firm with U.S. operations in New York, said security concerns related to outsourcing are getting more attention in corporate boardrooms. “Each time there’s a virus outbreak, this gets discussion within our CIO group here at Fortis as well as with the CEOs” of individual business units, Cedergren said.

Many of the financial services industry’s certification standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70, SysTrust and WebTrust, don’t fully cover what companies have been looking for in a best-practices matrix, according to Boettger.

More info: [url=http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/?q=node/view/543]http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/?q=node/view/543[/url]

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme