Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: March 2004

Antivirus vendors unzip encrypted email viruses

Posted on March 5, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Recent versions of the Bagle worm have bypassed corporate gateway security because they are distributed in password-protected Zip files, which are next to impossible for antivirus programs to scan. Emails infected with the Bagle worm, however, contain the password required for opening the Zip file.

Antivirus vendors BitDefender and Kaspersky Labs have both launched updates enabling their software to open any encrypted attachments using the password contained in the email text. Once the file is decrypted, it is treated as an executable file and scanned normally.

Eugene Kaspersky, head of antivirus research at Kaspersky Labs, said: “This new technology protects users from a new generation of worms, specifically worms that hide in password-protected Zip files. Five worms using this technique appeared within only four days – a new trend has been set in the computer underground,” he said.

Viorel Canja, head of BitDefender Labs, said in a statement: “We have developed an engine tasked with finding the Zip password in the email text.

Most AV products could only offer protection after the archive is extracted; that could be a little too late for inexperienced users,” he said. Simon Heron, director of Network Box, told ZDNet UK the product combines Kaspersky’s software with Network Box’s own technology to deal with the latest Bagle mutations at the network perimeter. According to Heron, this does mean the gateway is fractionally slower. “The worst case scenario is we will take 50 milliseconds extra to parse an email that has a password-encrypted attachment.

More info: http://www.silicon.com/software/security/0,39024655,39118922,00.htm

Read more

Business Thrives on Dangerous Roads

Posted on March 3, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

The better approach is to take some risks, and focus on your core mission: doing business efficiently and aggressively in the competitive marketplace. One of the risks of doing business while connected to the Internet is that bad things will happen occasionally.

Your organization may be one of the unlucky few that suffers a loss of personally identifiable information such as customer names and credit card numbers. Even during the worst moments of the Blaster or Slammer attacks, the companies and government agencies with the best event management programs suffered little.

The 100th dollar you spend has less relative impact than the 1st. Therefore, it is not the size of your security budget that matters, but the effectiveness and efficiency of your security choices. It is very tempting to buy products or services because you are afraid of the next security vulnerability.

Success lies in not over-spending on security nor making the security architecture so complex and extensive that it cannot be managed efficiently.

More info: http://www.csoonline.com/analyst/report2306.html

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme