Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: October 2004

A Seven-Step Plan For Protecting Corporate Data

Posted on October 1, 2004December 30, 2021 by admini

Enterprise Rights Management (ERM) is an umbrella term for products that mix elements of intellectual property protection with document control.

Unlike digital rights management technologies that strive to manage consumer use of published media, ERM focuses on business documents and data, seeking to control their creation, use and distribution. Rights management systems typically rely on servers operating in the background performing such functions as applying policies to content, authenticating users and granting rights. Rights management vendors and products have differing approaches and architectures.

In a nutshell, rights products can:
– Encrypt content;
– Assure that only the intended recipient can open the content;
– Control the recipient’s ability to copy, print, forward, alter or otherwise tamper with the information;
– Revoke access rights or expire the content itself to prevent further access; and
– Log all of the above to an audit trail.

Rights management vendors and products have differing approaches and architectures. SealedMedia, for example, works on the premise that content sent to external users gets returned to the sender once the sharing process is done. Liquid Machines sees rights management as enabling collaboration among trusted parties and focuses on usability — the idea that policy application and consequent document access should be as unobtrusive to processes as possible.

Some products — usually those that require server connectivity — allow rights to be changed even after the recipient has accessed the content.

Rights management shouldn’t be confused with records management. Although access rights to content can be expired using a rights management system, the content itself isn’t always destroyed, as it can be by a records management system. Losing the encryption key on a rights-protected document, for example, disables the recipient’s access to it, but the document itself may stay on the recipient’s drive.

Vendors such as PSS Systems offer a records management foundation and concentrate on applying company policy to internal documents so they can be controlled from creation to disposition, regardless of where they reside.

The Plan:
– Define the risks;
-Determine what content is worth protecting;
-Identify levels of trust and appropriate controls;
-Prescribe appropriate security for the content and the situation;
-Determine what assurance must be provided that content reaches only the intended recipient(s);
-Determine what should happen when content should no longer be shared; and
-Describe who has the authority to apply policies and what happens if policies conflict.

http://www.securitypipeline.com/49400427

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme