Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: April 2005

Security: It’s just a matter of asking the right questions

Posted on April 11, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

Almost all companies test for vulnerable versions (i.e., missing security patches) and default configuration files.

Before investing any time or money in securing or verifying the security of an application, first perform a risk assessment.

The following are areas that should be considered:
– Scripting;
– Enumeration;
– Passwords;
– Sessions;
– Error handling;
– Field variables;
– Code commenting;
– Session time-out;
– Session cache; and
– Network parameters.

http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020457,39194163,00.htm

Read more

The future of IT security is fewer walls, not more

Posted on April 8, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

A roving gang of European chief information security officers claims the key to better security is less walls not more — a concept they call deperimeterisation.

Security is a process not a product, says Jericho. Establish open standards for identity management, digital rights, encryption and data-level authentication, and we can eventually do away with the rest of the security infrastructure altogether while maintaining commercial and operational flexibility. But because the Jericho Forum is user-led, it is honest about the problems and pragmatic about a gradual introduction of these ideas.

ZDNet UK spoke to one of Jericho’s founders, Paul Simmonds, global information security director of chemical giant ICI, about the ideas behind deperimeterisation and pushing the organisations unique take on security to the US.

http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020457,39194164,00.htm

Read more

IMlogic Threat Center Reports Steady Rise in Targeted Attacks on Instant Messaging Networks in Q1 20

Posted on April 5, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

During the first quarter of 2005, IMlogic issued more than 15 priority alerts to enterprises and IMlogic Threat Center subscribers in response to the increasing frequency of reported IM threats. 75 new threats on public IM and peer-to-peer computing networks were discovered in the first three months of this year.

More than 50 percent of the incidents reported to the Threat Center during the first quarter of 2005 involved attacks at workplaces.

Only 11 percent of the incidents tracked by the Threat Center involved attacks on known vulnerabilities on IM applications.

The group said that 82 percent of the incidents reported to it involved IM virus or worm propagation, while 14 percent dealt with IM file transfer hijacking.

The Bropia, Kelvir and Serflog worms were found to be the three most frequently detected IM infections at workplaces.

The report released today by the IMlogic Threat Center provides complete data, analysis and discussion of key trends for the first three months of 2005.

More than 50 percent of externally reported incidents to the IMlogic Threat Center in Q1 2005 were attributed to enterprises and small businesses utilizing popular IM applications such as AOL Instant Messenger, MSN Messenger, Windows Messenger, and Yahoo!

The report highlights the increase in targeted IM attacks on corporate environments and the need for both enterprises and small businesses to prepare and defend against emerging IM threats.

Trend analysis provided in the IMlogic Threat Center Q1 2005 report suggests that IM-borne attacks will continue to increase as hackers capitalize on the growing popularity of IM in both consumer and corporate environments.

“The trends identified in our report will continue as IM becomes the new target for more sophisticated attacks aimed at disrupting Internet security,” said IMlogic Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Products Jon Sakoda.

The Q1 2005 IM Security Threat Report is available free of charge by visiting the company’s Web site at www.imlogic.com/online/Q105_IMThreatReport.asp.

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20050405005541&newsLang=en
http://www.zdnetindia.com/news/international/stories/120002.html

Read more

Privacy Pays For Banks

Posted on April 5, 2005December 30, 2021 by admini

“In the past, online banking was all about who had the best features and functions,” says Mike Weider, founder and CTO at risk-management solutions company Watchfire Inc. “Now, issues of trust, privacy, and security are more and more a differentiator between the leaders and the laggards.”

According to the 2005 Privacy Trust Survey for Online Banking, customers with a high degree of trust in their bank are more likely to use online financial services, which generate more profit for banks than offline transactions. The study, sponsored by Watchfire and conducted by the Ponemon Institute, a management-practices research organization, also finds that trusting customers are loyal, with 55% claiming they’ve never visited another bank’s Web site. The price of that loyalty is an expectation of privacy.

Among those with a high level of trust in their bank, 57% indicated that they would stop using online services in the event of a single privacy breach. More than 82% of respondents cited identity theft as their biggest concern should a privacy breach occur.

“Having a privacy problem will have a catastrophic effect,” Weider says. “Not only will you lose a lot of customers, but they’ll be your best customers.”

Asked what steps banks should take to earn customer trust, survey respondents wanted information sharing with third parties to be limited, fewer marketing pitches, and identity verification when conducting online transactions.

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=160500671

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme