Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: August 2006

August patch management woes strike again

Posted on August 17, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“Something always happens during the Christmas holiday, and it wrecks the holidays for IT administrators, and something always seems to happen in August to wreck their summer vacations,” she said. “Also, System Administrator Day is July 28, so maybe things happen in August to reinforce the appreciation everyone has for us.”

Paul Asadoorian, lead IT security engineer for Brown University in Providence, R.I., speculated that the annual Black Hat hacker event in Las Vegas is a factor. “People go to Black Hat and pick up all this knowledge about how to exploit various technologies,” Asadoorian said, “then they decide to use Patch Tuesday to practice their newest skills.” That’s especially problematic in a university environment, he said, since students returning to campus in August tend to come with computers that are infected with malware.

In the case of the Windows Server Service flaw, Bradley and Asadoorian are bracing for what may be another awful August. “We separate student computers from the rest of the campus and check them for problems before letting them on the network. Network access and/or endpoint assurance are two technologies every organization should try to take advantage of, something that checks the host when it tries to plug into the network,” Asadoorian said. “The good news is that the newer platforms are in wider use,” she said, noting that her environment is now made up of machines running Windows XP SP2 and Windows 2003.

Bradley’s advice for dealing with the current threat is to separate the MS06-040 patch from the rest of this month’s urgent updates and deal with that one first.

http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1210536,00.html

Read more

Defending Cell Phones and PDAs Against Attack

Posted on August 17, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

These messages, supposedly from a legitimate company, may try to convince you to visit a malicious site by claiming that there is a problem with your account or stating that you have been subscribed to a service.

Not only does this hide the real attacker’s identity, it allows the attacker to increase the number of targets (see Understanding Denial-of-Service Attacks for more information).

Trying to gain access to account information – In some areas, cell phones are becoming capable of performing certain transactions (from paying for parking or groceries to conducting larger financial transactions). An attacker who can gain access to a phone that is used for these types of transactions may be able to discover your account information and use or sell it.

Follow general guidelines for protecting portable devices
– Take precautions to secure your cell phone and PDA the same way you should secure your computer (see Cybersecurity for Electronic Devices and Protecting Portable Devices: Data Security for more information).

– Be careful about posting your cell phone number and email address – Attackers often use software that browses web sites for email addresses. These addresses then become targets for attacks and spam (see Reducing Spam for more information). By limiting the number of people who have access to your information, you limit your risk of becoming a victim.

Messages from unknown person = While the links may appear to be legitimate, they may actually direct you to a malicious web site.

Be wary of downloadable software – There are many sites that offer games and other software you can download onto your cell phone or PDA.

Disable Bluetooth when you are not using it to avoid unauthorized access (see Understanding Bluetooth Technology for more information).

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/ST06-007.html

Read more

When Disaster Strikes, Manage it

Posted on August 16, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

The rapid development of the internet has made it easier to reach and communicate with your clients and suppliers, and whether you choose to be an e-tailer or are forced by suppliers to order online, IT functions will probably be at the core of your business.

This may be in the form of communications, customer/supplier management or just product/company information. As the majority of us rely so heavily on email for communication, I challenge anyone who is happy to tell their board of directors that email is not working and “might not be back online for a while”!

When disasters strike, the media will want to know what has happened, how it happened, whose fault it was, what you are doing to recover and how you are managing the relationships with your clients and suppliers. You are not just responsible for creating the plan and deciding on appropriate levels of protection and recovery methods but also for training your staff. Remember these are not the only skills required and I am looking at a fairly basic level, but without these key skills your business continuity plan is unlikely to get off the ground, let alone be effective.

http://www.it-observer.com/articles/1209/when_disaster_strikes_manage_it/

Read more

Spain’s cybercrime growing fast

Posted on August 12, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Users in Spain have also been warned about new types of attacks that do not follow the typical path expected of phishing scams.

The new online safety campaign in Spain is backed by the Spanish government, police and the Association of Internet Users, as well as banks and other institutions.

http://www.viruslist.com/en/news?id=194527499

Read more

Search Engine Goes On Offensive

Posted on August 12, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“I used to do a lot of incident response, where someone would have a compromised system containing unknown files,” Valsmith says. “I would try to figure out what the files were, and I always thought, ‘I wish there was someplace I could go online and find out what these files are.’ So in late December of 2005, I set up the Website and started adding malware and analysis to it.”

Working on a self-funded project in the garage of co-founder Danny Quist, the two researchers began collecting and analyzing malware files for inclusion in the search engine. Soon, they added data from popular, open-source malware collections, such as Nepenthes and MWCollect, and then contributors began sending them files from their own collections.

“We get some contributions every day now, through our Web upload interface,” Valsmith says. “We hit 40,000 samples today.” Without Offensive Computing, IT troubleshooters and security researchers often are left scrounging for information about malware files that they find in their systems, Valsmith explains. “Antivirus systems in general only have about a 20 percent detection rate, so there is a ton of malware running around out there that few people know anything about,” he says. “Hopefully, we can help fill that gap.”

The groundswell of support for Offensive Computing’s efforts is indicative of a growing desire for more unified, consolidated study among security researchers, observers say. The search engine is not the only consolidation effort in town: At the Defcon conference in Las Vegas last week, Internet pioneer Paul Vixie and Georgia Institute of Technology bot researcher David Dagon announced that they have created a “malware repository” that helps researchers identify new bot exploits.

Vixie’s and Dagon’s repository includes data from Nepenthes as well as tens of thousands of malware contributions from Shadowserver.org.

Both Offensive Computing and the malware repository are designed to bring security researchers together and speed the process of shutting down new attacks. “Something has to change, because the malware authors are getting more and more sophisticated,” Valsmith says.

“We have actually been talking with some antivirus vendors on ways we can help each other improve,” he says. “We really want to reach out to the AV community and find ways to collaborate.” As more people become aware of the site, more analysis and samples are contributed, which builds up a knowledge base that people can use to help defend against threats.” However, such a unified effort could be tricky, because antivirus vendors make their living by collecting new exploits and trying to be the first to defeat them, observers note. A consolidated database of malware samples and suggested solutions could level the playing field and threaten AV vendors’ business, they add.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=101270&WT.svl=news1_1

Read more

Implementing Information Safeguards Under Gramm-Leach-Bliley

Posted on August 11, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) contains a rule, known as the Safeguard Rule, under which the Federal Trade Commission and other federal agencies have established standards for financial institutions relating to administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for customer information. The objectives are to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect against threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records, and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.

The rule requires financial institutions to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that contains administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. As part of its program, each financial institution must designate an employee or employees to coordinate its information security program.

The FTC has published a complete list of safeguards at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/safeguards.htm When implementing the Safeguards Rule, a company must consider all areas of its operation, especially employee management and training; information systems; and managing system failures. Companies may also want to check the references of any potential employees who would have access to customer information, and ask each new employee to sign an agreement to follow the confidentiality and security standards for handling that information. The Safeguards Rule also requires financial institutions to maintain security within their information systems – which include network and software design as well as information processing, storage, transmission, retrieval, and disposal.

Similarly, in order to prevent and manage system failures, the new publication suggests that companies should respond to any security breach in a timely manner; regularly update firewalls and antivirus software; and install patches to repair software vulnerabilities. The FTC provides additional guidance at http://www.ftc.gov/infosecurity.

Guidance is also available from leading security professionals who’ve assembled consensus lists of vulnerabilities and defenses so that every organization, regardless of its resources or expertise in information security, can take basic steps to reduce its risks.

http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=160&PHPSESSID=dcbc1ff3dbe449eb074c7951e447cda1

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme