Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: September 2006

SAP Pushes Compliance as Strategy

Posted on September 7, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Doug Merritt, executive vice president and general manager of suite optimization products and technology at SAP, said that consultants in the compliance arena, regulatory bodies and other vendors will also be able to contribute to this repository. “It allows companies to manage hugely heterogeneous landscapes,” noted Merritt. Merritt said the solution will help risk managers and business owners identify financial, legal and operational risks, analyze business opportunities in light of these risks, and develop appropriate responses.

The key to all three solutions, the company said, is that they give line-of-business executives greater visibility of how governance and risk-management policies are implemented and followed in the course of doing business. Effective GRC management can do more than ensure that companies are in compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and other regulations, said Merritt. “GRC is more business-driven than just keeping the CEO out of jail,” said Merritt in response to a question from internetnews.com during a conference call this week. “Understanding the relative risks and rewards of different activities is as critical or more critical than regulatory reporting,” he said.

Amit Chatterjee, senior vice president of the risk and compliance management unit at SAP, said that whatever can be monitored can be managed.

SAP GRC Repository and SAP GRC Process Control will be generally available Nov. 30. Other solutions, particularly those pertinent to industry verticals, will become part of the new solution during the second quarter of next year.

SAP also announced that it is bringing these products to market jointly with networking solutions vendor Cisco Systems (Quote, Chart).

http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3630606

Read more

Winning the Compliance Game

Posted on September 6, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Auditing woes mostly stem from improperly securing user machines and servers, according to the council’s findings. “The problems being flagged in audits are in user and access controls on PCs and laptops, audit reporting and problems in configuration change management,” Hurley says.

Those with poor audits are spending 43 percent of their IT budget on security equipment and software for IT compliance and those with successful audits, 52 percent. “They are taking money out of labor and putting it into automating the processes” such as measurement and monitoring IT compliance across the board, Hurley says.

“The organizations [surveyed] doing continuous monitoring had the least number of audit deficiencies.”

Meanwhile, security firms that perform vulnerability assessments and penetration testing say regulatory compliance is driving much of their business today. Steve Stasiukonis, vice president and founder of Secure Network Technologies, says regulatory compliance pressures from SOX and HIPAA, for instance, are one of the main reasons his clients hire him.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=103041&WT.svl=news2_5

Read more

Cisco, Microsoft Reveal Long-Awaited Network Access Control Plans

Posted on September 6, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

But the need for network access control won’t wait that long, so businesses will have to continue to control network access using technology already available in some of Cisco’s products and through other security vendors.

By year’s end, Cisco and Microsoft will offer a limited beta program–with no more than three mutual customers–to gain a more realistic understanding of how their access control technologies will work together. As these beta testers will soon find out, combined network access protection and network access control consists of several client-side software applications that check and communicate the health of laptops, desktops, and other devices attempting to connect into a given network.

On the network side, Cisco routers and switches, Cisco Secure Access Control Server, Microsoft Network Policy Server, and policy servers from other vendors work together to give the thumbs up or thumbs down to any device seeking to connect.

Cisco and Microsoft have cross-licensed the Cisco NAC and Microsoft NAP protocols used to communicate information between clients and networks to help ensure their products continue to work together.

A Forrester Research study of 149 technology decision makers at North American companies found that while more than one-third plan to adopt some type of network access control this year, the rest cite cost and manageability as obstacles to deployment.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192501974

Read more

Researchers Challenge DOS Attack Data

Posted on September 6, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

But because this measurement technique assumes the DOS attack was launched through spoofed IP addresses, it doesn’t account for DOS attacks launched via botnets, which have become a much more attractive vector for attackers, the research team said.

The new study combines traditional indirect measurement of backscatter with direct measurement of Netflow and alarms from a commercial DOS detection system.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=103049&WT.svl=news2_3

Read more

Network security sales top $1.1 billion in 2Q06

Posted on September 5, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

2Q06 Highlights
– Cisco continues to lead in worldwide network security appliance and software sales, with 36% of total revenue, a position they have more or less maintained since 2002
– Juniper passes Check Point and is now in second place for worldwide revenue at 10%
-Check Point is now third for worldwide revenue at 9%
-Integrated security appliances and software make up 85% of worldwide network security revenue, IDS/IPS 15

http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms06.sec.2q06.nr.shtml

Read more

IPS Technology: Ready for Overhaul

Posted on September 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“It gave you a device to protect your vulnerable systems behind the network from SQL Slammer, Blaster, etc.,” says Richard Stiennon, president of IT-Harvest. But major worm infestations aren’t the problem any more: “The trouble is what we’ve really been doing for the last four years is vulnerability and patch management. “The driver for IPS hasn’t really been there.”

In some cases, the technology is being integrated into hardware and services; in other cases, it is evolving to offer new capabilities.

Arbor Networks’ Morville says service providers and managed security service providers meanwhile are already delivering firewall and IPS-based services, and that trend of blended security services will “accelerate” over the next few years.

Switches, too, are already coming with some IPS technology: Cisco, for instance, sells blades for its Catalyst switches with IPS functionality.

What about the signature-based limitations of IPSes? IPS will also converge with anomaly detection and other features that expand its inspection capabilities beyond known threats, experts say. Rate-based anomaly detection, such as spotting a traffic flood, makes sense at the perimeter, Morville says. And behavioral anomaly detection — where you’re looking for individual people or hosts acting outside the norm — is best for the internal network, he says.

Some experts envision IPSes deploying virtual machine technology — as FireEye’s does with its network access control (NAC) appliance –where virtual machines run copies of incoming traffic to see if it’s legit, rather than just using signatures. The trick with a beefed-up IPS is getting good performance, though: Hardware would have to catch up to make it viable, especially if virtual machine-based features are added, says John Pescatore, a vice president with Gartner.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=102608&WT.svl=news1_3

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme