Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: September 2006

Survey: Data breaches difficult to spot, prevent

Posted on September 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“I don’t think I expected two-thirds to say they can’t prevent a breach,” said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. “If your first line of defense says you can’t win the war, it indicates a big problem.”

High false positive rates of up to 35% affect the ability of many organizations to detect a breach.

According to the Ponemon Institute’s final report on the survey:
-High false positive rates of up to 35% affect the ability of many organizations to detect a breach.
– 41% of respondents don’t believe they are effectively enforcing data security policies. The top reason given for failed enforcement is lack of resources.
– Respondents said there’s a 68% probability they can detect a large data breach involving more than 10,000 data files.
– But they said small data breaches involving fewer than 100 files are only likely to be detected 51% of the time.
– Only 16 % of respondents believe they are invulnerable to a data breach.
– Excessive cost was the main reason 35% of respondents said they’re not using leak-prevention technologies.

“There’s a lot of frustration at the CIO level, because there’s a feeling that the responsibilities should be shared across the management structure more than they are,” he said. “They’re also concerned about their ability to enforce security policies. Even when someone finds the culprit behind a breach, policies aren’t enforced and mistakes are repeated in terms of what users do in their computing habits.”

Raj Dhingra, PortAuthority Technologies’ vice president of products and marketing, said his company sponsored the study because it wanted to pinpoint the root causes of corporate data breaches. “We feel this study helps bring greater understanding of these issues, while validating that the industry requires much more than just monitoring of information leaks, but automated enforcement to best prevent information leaks,” he said.

http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid14_gci1213621,00.html

Read more

Two years on, Netsky-P tops virus charts

Posted on September 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Sophos identified a total of 1,998 new threats in August 2006, with Trojan horses accounting for 71.8 percent of those threats.

“It is certainly frustrating that such easily beaten threats are still plaguing our e-mail highways,” Carole Theriault, a Sophos senior security consultant, said in a statement. “If you use the Internet and don’t have proper security measures in place, you are not only endangering your data, you are keeping nasty old timers like Mytob and Netsky worms alive and kicking.”

But some industry observers question the usefulness of keeping tabs on how widespread a virus roams, versus other metrics such as the degree in which it affects users’ pocketbooks when sensitive data is stolen. Malicious attackers over the years have switched their agenda from seeking fame to obtaining profits.

http://news.com.com/Two+years+on%2C+Netsky-P+tops+virus+charts/2100-7349_3-6111716.html?tag=nefd.top

Read more

Trusted computing a shield against worst attacks?

Posted on September 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

“We didn’t know what we were going to get back–what we wanted was to objectively look at the losses caused by attacks,” said Dirck Schou, senior director of security solutions for Phoenix Technologies.

Device identification–or attestation–is a central capability of the hardware component of the trusted computing model, known as the Trusted Platform Module (TPM). Phoenix Technologies, which makes one version of the basic input/output system (BIOS) that allows operating systems to control a computer’s hardware, has created products that work with the TPM to identify the computer systems on a corporate network, but has also created products that can also work without the specialized hardware, Schou said.

Yet, more and more personal computers and laptop systems are shipped with the technology already on board. About 20 million computers, most of them laptops, shipped with the Trusted Platform Module in 2005, according to the Trusted Computing Group, the industry association that has created the hardware specification.

“For example, IP addresses could be used to authenticate some machines–and are probably sufficient under some threat models and policies to make the distinction between ‘sanctioned’ and ‘unsanctioned’ machines.”

The study found that the industries hardest hit by attacks were government, retail and high-tech, and that 78 percent of attackers used a home computer to do the deed, but that leaves a lot of questions unanswered, Schoen said.

Companies should ask whether they can reliably distinguish between sanctioned and unsanctioned computers on the network, whether employees working from home on unsanctioned computers would be allowed to access the network, and whether the technology could be deployed pervasively enough to matter. “We would need to know that the unsanctioned computers were actually necessary to the commission of these crimes, and that the crimes could not have been committed without using the unsanctioned computers,” Schoen stated in the e-mail interview.

http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11410

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme