Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: December 2006

Virtual concerns

Posted on December 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

Multiple real servers can be consolidated into one larger, more powerful virtual server platform; just pack a single server with a lot of memory and a very fast CPU. But what’s coming on the virtual forefront is even more revolutionary. I know of one company that’s going to allow its employees to work from home using virtual images. The company will send the entire corporate image to the employee over a VPN connection, or at worst, on a single DVD.

Security experts and power users are using virtual machines to explore the riskier parts of the Internet without worry of host desktop modification. Banks and protection vendors are coming up with innovative solutions that involve sending virtual desktops to their online customers to prevent remote control bots from stealing PINs or fraudulently transferring bank balances.

First, because new virtual machines are so easy to create, administrators and operators aren’t treating them with the same security thoroughness as they do real metal and wire servers.

Second, if attackers break out of a VM into the host, they can immediately impact every other supported host on the server.

Third, anti-virus software and other scanners on the outside can’t easily scan inside virtual workstation images for worms, bots, and other threats.

Last, there are no comprehensive studies to prove how well a virtual machine protects against running malware.

Like instant messaging and USB thumb drives, the virtual revolution is coming whether you like it or not. Discuss the impact virtual machines will have on your environment, especially on security, with vendors and your technical staff.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/12/01/49OPsecadvise_1.html

Read more

New E-Discovery Rules Take Effect

Posted on December 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

E-mail has been used as evidence in court cases for years; the amended rules also cover electronic documents, spreadsheets, image and sound files, and database info.

The amended rules explicitly state that requested information must be turned over within 120 days after a complaint has been served on a defendant. If this deadline isn’t met, it’s possible that electronic evidence could be ruled inadmissible. Or in the instance of a defendant sitting on potentially damaging evidence, courts can levy fines and other penalties.

The amended rules are to CIOs what Sarbanes-Oxley was to CFOs, says Riki Fujitani, a former attorney who’s now president of IT service provider Hoike.

The courts are showing their understanding that information is much easier to retrieve from modern storage technologies, while at the same time acknowledging that finding the right information on obsolete media could be just as difficult as digging up a paper document in a warehouse of filing cabinets.

In a survey by Enterprise Strategy Group, 91% of 568 e-mail, database, and compliance pros at companies with more than 20,000 employees said their organizations had been issued a discovery request for e-mail last year.

One thing that’s anything but ambiguous is the legal system’s disdain for companies that intentionally destroy electronically stored information. Morgan Stanley in May paid $15 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges that it destroyed more than 200,000 e-mails and failed to cooperate with SEC investigators looking into Wall Street business practices.

Courts have over the past six years or so changed their views on the credibility of electronic documents, says Diego Maldonado, senior VP of the government technology group within consulting firm The Newberry Group.

Despite the amendments, there are still gray areas related to e-discovery.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=TEDZYBQNAAK00QSNDLPCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=196600853

Read more

Fortifying Identity Products

Posted on December 1, 2006December 30, 2021 by admini

SiteMinder 6.0 SP5, which securely provisions access rights across the Internet as a key piece of CA’s IAM platform, now better supports so-called “strong authentication,” which includes tokens, smartcards and biometrics.

Along the lines of providing more choice, SiteMinder provides a new federation end point, which uses technology licensed from Ping Identity, to improve security provisioning among partners in the federation. “The idea of SiteMinder is that if you have a Web application that many business partners need to get to, you’ll need a hub a platform on which to support that federation,” Gardiner said.

SiteMinder, acquired through CA’s Netegrity purchase, is the key policy engine of CA’s IAM suite, but the company spruced up other pieces of its IAM suite.

In HP’s IdM suite, HP Select Audit software has been integrated with HP’s Select Identity, Select Federation and Select Access, adding audit, attestation, monitoring, alerting, reporting and archiving capabilities to those applications. HP conducted some integration and improvements to its own identity and access management software suite, according to Sai Allavarpu, director of product management and marketing for identity and security management at HP.

http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3646601

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme