Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: November 2008

Secure OS Gets Highest NSA Rating, Goes Commercial

Posted on November 18, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

This means that the OS was designed and certified to defend against well-funded and sophisticated attackers,” says David Chandler, CEO of Integrity Global Security, the new Green Hills subsidiary.

Integrity-178 B meets the rigorous Common Criteria Separation Kernel Protection Profile (SKPP) standard, which guarantees that malicious code can’t corrupt or harm any other application running on the system.

“I’m delighted that they have accomplished this,” said Stephen Hanna, co-chair of the Trusted Computing group and distinguished engineer with Juniper Networks, during his keynote at the CSI 2008 conference in National Harbor, Md., Tuesday.

http://www.darkreading.com/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212100421

Read more

2 Log Managers Show State Of The Art

Posted on November 8, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

LogLogic’s LX2010
On the whole, we were very impressed with the LX2010, but it’s expensive compared with LogRhythm and others. IT managers–and system admins, for that matter–hate logs, because they seemingly go on forever and often provide an overabundance of useless information. Administrators get lost looking for one or two important log entries scattered through a log file with tens of thousands of entries. LogLogic’s simple-to-use Boolean search capabilities can help find that needle in a haystack.

We tested LogLogic’s LX2010, a dual-processor, 2U appliance that comes fully equipped with 2 TB of internal storage (RAID-10), dual power supplies, two bonded Gigabit NICs for log collection, and a 10/100 port for the Web-based management user interface. The 2010 can be deployed as a centralized solution for small and midsize businesses, but it’s often deployed as a remote-office log collector in a hub-and-spoke configuration, with the flagship ST2010 or ST3010 appliance serving as the hub. As an intelligent syslog server, the 2010 automatically detected and categorized incoming logs as we configured each of 10 Cisco PIX firewalls to connect to the LogLogic 2010. To ship our Windows server logs over to the 2010, it was necessary to install a LogLogic proprietary version of Lasso, an open source-based product that was built as a gateway between Microsoft’s event-logging format and syslog. Once complete, the 2010 automatically recognized and grouped all the server log data accordingly. The 2010 isn’t a security event manager, or SEM, per se, but it can be configured to alert IT in the event of a failed condition, so in a way it can perform some of the same core functions of a good SEM.

THE UPSHOT CLAIM: LogLogic aims to deliver a new level of visibility, reporting, and analytics to the massive number of logs that are typically distributed among a wide range of enterprise IT systems. Using a simple yet powerful LogLogic reporting engine that’s well suited for forensic and troubleshooting chores, administrators can locate important information often contained in logs that would otherwise be difficult to find through manual searches.

LogRhythm 4.0
IT systems can generate a ton of log events–not all of which are useful–in the name of compliance. Today’s log management systems maintain two different types of logs: raw logs that come straight from network devices; and processed data, which the log manager indexes for searching and reporting. Log managers like LogRhythm can both store raw messages and extract important data, such as IP address, user name, message importance, and message classification. Settings are defined either by log manager, the server collecting the log messages; or by log source, the program or application generating the logs, such as Windows events or Unix syslog.

LogRhythm 4.0’s other new features include log server monitoring for CPU load, memory usage, and message volume, so you can track system performance in real time. Previous versions of LogRhythm archived log messages in batches, which meant there was a time lag between when a message was received and when it was archived, and the log message had to be stored in the online database to be archived. In LogRhythm 4.0, log archiving is independent of log processing, and archiving occurs in real time. Using the Drop Log function, nothing is written to the online database, while the Drop Raw function writes the metadata to the online database and drops the raw log.

Log management vendors such as LogLogic, Prism, and Q1 Labs are adding features to simplify the process, including data mining and analysis capabilities.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/compliance/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212000974

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme