Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: April 2013

Detection, response key to effective security

Posted on April 11, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

With corporate security measures becoming increasingly more effective, often the only point of entry to a company’s network for a cyber criminal is via an employee.

“Research found that the negative impact of mobile devices on security was not only the result of the mobility of devices, but because of a number of assumptions IT departments make around the data they carry. In today’s mobile business environment, securing mobile devices has become a priority, but many IT departments neglect to think about the fact that the data carried on these devices isn’t contained as it would be in a centralised office environment. By working with the assumption that this is the same situation as when the data is in the data centre, IT becomes an unwitting accomplice of cyber criminals, according to Kaspersky’s research,” Myburgh points out.

“IDC data also shows that mobility is the number one factor driving new security spending, suggesting that more organisations are taking heed and beefing up security measures beyond their data centre perimeters.”

Link: http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=63127

Read more

Security updates likely to keep admins busy in April

Posted on April 9, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

According to the Security Bulletin Advance Notification for April 2013, the first critical update is for all versions of Internet Explorer (IE), including the newest IE 10, on Windows 8 and RT. This vulnerability should be at the top of patching priority lists as it allows remote code execution through users visiting a compromised website, which is of the most popular attack methods, said Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology officer at security firm Qualys.

Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle, said it is almost certain that this month’s IE patch fixes the Pwn2Own bug from CanSec West.

The second Microsoft security update is aimed at a “critical” vulnerability that affects the Windows Operating System, except the newest versions – Windows 8, Server 2012 and Windows RT for tablets. “The vulnerabilities addressed in these bulletins typically allow the attacker an escalation of privilege from a normal user to an admin-level user once they are already on the machine or can trick the user to open a specifically crafted file,” said Kandek.

Ziv Mador, director of security research at Trustwave, said it would be interesting to find out how the vulnerability in Windows Defender was discovered and disclosed.

There is also an out-of-cycle update for Java from Oracle this month.

Link: http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240181030/Security-updates-likely-to-keep-admins-busy-this-month?utm_medium=EM&asrc=EM_ERU_21243939&utm_campaign=20130408_ERU%20Transmission%20for%2004/08/2013%20(UserUniverse:%20626713)_myka-reports@techtarget.com&utm_source=ERU&src=5119914

Read more

Google Uses Reputation To Detect Malicious Downloads

Posted on April 8, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

“CAMP bridges the gap between blacklists and whitelists by augmenting both approaches with a reputation system that is applied to unknown content,” the researchers wrote in the paper, adding: “One of CAMP’s important properties is to minimize the impact on user privacy while still providing protection.”

Google’s own real-world test–deploying the system to 200 million Chrome users over six months–found that CAMP could detect 98.6 percent of malware flagged by a virtual-machine-based analysis platform.

In many ways, CAMP is an answer to Microsoft’s SmartScreen, a technology that Microsoft built into its Internet Explorer and the latest version of its operating system, Windows 8.

The CAMP service renders a reputation–benign, malicious or unknown–for a file based on the information provided by the client and reputation data measure during certain time windows, including daily, weekly and quarterly measurements. Information about the download URL, the Internet address of the download server, any referrer information, the size and hash value of the download and any certificates used to sign the file are sent to Google to calculate a reputation score.

URL classification services–such as McAfee’s SiteAdvisor, Symantec’s Safe Web, and Google’s own Safe Browsing–fared eve

n worse, only detecting at most 11 percent of the URLs from which malicious files were downloaded.

The Google researchers who authored the paper–including Moheeb Abu Rajab and Niels Provos–decided to focus on executables downloaded by the user, not on malicious files that attempted to exploit a user’s system.

Link: http://www.darkreading.com/security-monitoring/167901086/security/client-security/240152413/google-uses-reputation-to-detect-malicious-downloads.html

Read more

Mobile users in Middle East victims of cyber crime: Study

Posted on April 7, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

“People are relying more and more on their mobile phones and tablets to navigate, share, socialize and shop in today’s constantly-connected world,” said Tamim Taufiq, head of consumer sales MENA for Symantec.

“What many consumers may not realise is exactly how much of their personal and private information is up for grabs should these devices be compromised, lost or stolen.”

Yet as people expand their online lives through mobile devices, many are not taking steps to secure their device and the content it contains.

Nearly one in four mobile device users in the MENA admit to not always downloading applications from trustworthy sources – Close to three in 10 (29 percent) indicated that they do not use secure payment methods when making purchases from their mobile device, leaving their sensitive information such as credit card details vulnerable.

Link: http://www.sify.com/news/mobile-users-in-middle-east-victims-of-cyber-crime-study-news-international-nehcuceehfb.html

Read more

Pandemic Cyber Security Failures Open An Historic Opportunity For Investors

Posted on April 7, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

Some examples of large security breaches resulting from poor security practices include a recent Distributed Denial of Service Attack (DDOS) against Spamhaus which clogged Internet lines leading Matthew Prince, Chief Executive of Cloud Flare, to compare the attack to a nuclear bomb.

From my discussions with top security professionals at leading security organizations, including Big 4 consulting and assurance companies, software such as Antivirus and Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDS/IPS) are currently only marginally effective at catching security threats. In addition, many security solutions are installed out of the box with little modification or customization to the needs of each network, leading to reduced or ineffective defense.

For instance, Fireeye is a product that has developed a learning system that collects data on existing attacks from their subscribers using their custom tools. While hackers previously had the upper hand in combining security known weaknesses into highly complex attacks, Fireeye tools use the same method of sharing security breaches with each other to raise the defense profile of each of the subscribers on the network quickly.

In addition, VMware’s partnership with Cisco hardware networking products provides a robust, integrated security solution with a hardware provider that dominates the corporate LAN network device space.

Costs for adoption of OpenStack software are cheaper than VMware, but the system is newer and not as well documented. Most companies run both Linux and Windows servers, and I expect in a similar way VMware and OpenStack will coexist as solutions in the cloud space. In addition to a maturing product portfolio, IT leaders would do well to strengthen focus on security by hiring technicians with a proven security background, such as Information Assurance and Security professionals.

Link: http://seekingalpha.com/article/1324971-pandemic-cyber-security-failures-open-an-historic-opportunity-for-investors?source=feed

Read more

A Different Approach To Foiling Hackers? Let Them In, Then Lie To Them.

Posted on April 6, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

In MITRE’s five-day virtual war game, which the group played out in late January of 2012, the Blue Team was given a mission titled Operation Beggar’s Banquet, of killing a fictional terrorist leader named Richard Hakluyt. The scenario dictated that Hakluyt had holed up in a compound in the fictional People’s Republic of Virginia, (represented by the Red Team) which was in a state of cold war with the equally fictional Republic of New England, represented by Blue. Blue’s secret mission was to parachute a special operations group next to Hakluyt’s compound, which would use a laser designator system to help a gunship target the compound and blow it up, before deploying a Fulton Surface-To-Air-Recovery plane to retrieve the special ops team.

While the game was still in its first day of pre-action planning, Red’s hackers immediately breached Blue’s network and gained access to all of its mission plans, which had been stored on an internal wiki.

Stech and Heckman had worked on a so-called “denial and deception” system they called BlackJack, which they planned to use to create a parallel version of Blue’s network in real time to misdirect Red’s hackers with false information.

According to Heckman and Stech, Blue used those hacked accounts to feed Red a story about a member of Blue’s team who had foolishly planned to kill Hakluyt when in fact, a murder would be too politically incendiary to risk. Blue went on to create an alternate story that it planned to instead track and then kidnap Hakluyt by using information provided by a double agent within Red’s team that Blue called “Cotton Dollar.” Blue used its compromised accounts to feed Red information about when it planned to use its informant Cotton Dollar’s information to send a special forces team to kidnap Hakluyt during a trip outside the compound.

Richard Bejtlich, chief security officer with the breach response firm Mandiant, which recently detailed in a report hundreds of breaches by a prolific team of sophisticated Chinese government hackers, says that creating a fake playground for observing and misinforming intruders can be a costly and dangerous game. Or you have to do so much work setting up a juicy fake network that I pretty much guarantee it takes more time to set up than it takes the intruder to figure out that it’s fake.”

Link: http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/04/05/a-different-approach-to-foiling-hackers-let-them-in-then-lie-to-them/

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme