Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Month: April 2013

Malware attacks occur every three minutes

Posted on April 5, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

When sending spear phishing emails, attackers opt for file names with common business terms to lure unsuspecting users into opening the malware and initiating the attack. These terms fall into three general categories: shipping and delivery, finance, and general business.

Instances of malware are uncovered that execute only when users move a mouse, a tactic which could dupe current sandbox detection systems since the malware doesn’t generate any activity.

By avoiding the more common .exe file type, attackers leverage DLL files to prolong infections. Ashar Aziz, FireEye founder and CTO said: “As cybercriminals invest more in advanced malware and innovations to better evade detection, enterprises must rethink their security infrastructure and reinforce their traditional defenses with a new layer of security that is able to detect these dynamic, unknown threats in real time.”

Link: http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=2455

Read more

Tenable Celebrates Nessus’ 15th Birthday and Network Security Leadership

Posted on April 5, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

Shown in a timeline highlighting some of the major milestones over the past 15 years, Nessus was launched on the Linux operating system (OS) on April 4, 1998, by Renaud Deraison, Tenable’s CRO and co-founder. … Today, running on Windows, Mac, FreeBSD, Solaris, and a variety of Linux-based OSes or from our cloud service, Nessus scans more OSes, applications, and network infrastructures than any other solution.

Following the product’s 10-year anniversary, Nessus continued expanding and gained significant recognition as it was named one of SC Magazine’s “Top 20 Products” of the last 20 years in 2009, reached 15,000 Nessus and SecurityCenter customers worldwide in 2012, and surpassed 10,000,000 downloads and 54,000 plugins in 2013.

Link: http://bw.newsblaze.com/story/2013040407025700001.bw/topstory.html

Read more

Is There Any Real Measurement In Monitoring?

Posted on April 5, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

After the analytics skirmishes, the other kind of “intelligence” came up, namely the number and variety of additional inputs to the algorithms: reputation, geolocation, indicators of compromise, or possibly the number of former government intelligence analysts in the research team (and/or on the board of directors).

And then it’s back to numbers: the number of external intelligence feeds that are used to enrich the data that the monitoring system processes.

Can one system produce data that is “more actionable” than another one, and if so, how do you prove it?

Not only will the data be processed “live” (which is supposed to be better than “real-time,” I understand – or maybe it’s the other way around), but it’ll be newer than anyone else’s data, still dewy from the data fields.

One thing’s for sure: buyers will still be wading through the marketing morass, trying to search out bits of dry land that will hold up to a purchasing decision. Not only will they have trouble differentiating vendors and their offerings; they’ll also struggle to find metrics that tell them when their monitoring is good enough.

Link: http://www.darkreading.com/security-monitoring/blog/240152343/is-there-any-real-measurement-in-monitoring.html

Read more

ICS-CERT Examines 3 Years of Data to Reveal Common Vulnerabilities for Critical Asset Owners

Posted on April 4, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

“ICS-CERT encourages asset owners to review their network for these common security gaps and take measures to eliminate known system vulnerabilities,” ICS-CERT wrote.

For some organizations, the network architecture was not well understood, or the administrators were not consistently enforcing remote login policies or controlling incoming and outgoing media.

Along with improperly deployed network devices, the assessment uncovered configuration issues, such as weak testing environments, weak backup and restore capabilities, and poor or limited patch management.

“The assessments also assisted these organizations in identifying and prioritizing their most critical vulnerabilities requiring immediate attention and provided real-time resolutions and recommendations for enhancing their security awareness and defensive posture,” ICS-CERT said.

Link: http://www.securityweek.com/ics-cert-examines-3-years-data-reveal-common-vulnerabilities-critical-asset-owners

Read more

Cyberattacks Abound Yet Companies Tell SEC Losses Are Few

Posted on April 4, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

After a wave of cyber attacks hit a Federal Reserve website, the New York Times and other news outlets, and U.S. banks, President Barack Obama issued an executive order in February to better protect businesses and critical assets, such as pipelines and power grids.

The SEC issued guidance in October 2011 telling companies to disclose cyber attacks or risks if that information is material, meaning it would affect an investor’s willingness to buy, hold, or sell the company’s stock.

“For the sake of investors, the SEC needs to figure out a way of enforcing the appropriate disclosure of material cyber attacks,” said Jacob Olcott, who led a congressional review as counsel to Senator Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, that resulted in the SEC guidance.

Cyber attacks are more likely to be material for some companies than others, Brian Lane, a former SEC corporation finance director, said in an interview.

Almost all of the top 100 U.S. companies by revenue said they rely on technology that may be vulnerable to security breaches, theft of proprietary data and disrupted operations, according to a review of their most recent annual reports.

ConocoPhillips, one of at least six major U.S. and European energy companies reported by Bloomberg to have been breached by China-based hackers beginning in 2009, said in its 2012 annual report no cyber breaches “had a material effect.”

Coca-Cola acknowledged its “information systems are a target of attacks,” in its 10-K and said the disruptions “to date have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.”

If a company doesn’t disclose an attack in an SEC filing that was reported in the news media, “don’t be surprised if we ask you to provide us with a materiality analysis,” Jim Lopez, an SEC branch chief for disclosure operations, said at a Washington conference in February.

While Verizon said in its 2012 10-K the cyber attacks it experienced haven’t been material, the company said the potential costs of a major assault include “expensive incentives” to keep customers, a jump in security spending, lost revenue and damage to the company’s reputation.

Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-04/cyberattacks-abound-yet-companies-tell-sec-losses-are-few.html

Read more

The New Normal: Wednesday Is DDoS Day At Citi

Posted on April 4, 2013December 30, 2021 by admini

A group that calls itself the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Cyber Fighters took responsibility for the American Express attack, as it has for other attacks on banks and financial services organizations. Third party analysis of the attacks on American Express and other banks suggest that those behind the operation are well-funded and sophisticated: leveraging networks of compromised web servers to host attacks and using sophisticated tools to target weak points in public facing banking and business applications.

In February, the website Krebsonsecurity reported that Bank of the West was the victim of a large denial of service attack that acted as cover for unauthorized transfers from one of the bank’s commercial customers that totaled $900,000.

However, Citi has been hampered in its investigation by a lack of reliable data, constrained funding and a dearth of forensic and case management tools to analyze it, she said.

The bank has plenty of security software and hardware, and relies heavily on its security information management (SIM) systems, but the focus is still on protecting Citi’s network from external threats or removing threats, not analyzing activity within the network to spot malicious or suspicious goings on. Activity due to malware or phishing attacks and lateral movement on the network characteristic of so-called “advanced persistent threats” can be difficult to spot with current tools, she said.

Out of 100 countries, Older estimated that only 50 have laws that allow Citi to look at the kinds of specific data on IP addresses, logins and other data that’s necessary to conduct a proper investigation. “We have cases where we know there’s malware there, and we know an investigation happened, but we can’t get the data back,” Older said. “I think it would benefit us greatly if we could get past that and find a way to be sensitive to privacy regulations in a way that also lets us get meaningful data.”

Link: http://securityledger.com/the-new-normal-wednesday-is-ddos-day-at-citigroup/

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme