Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=mail=3Dpaulgdavis.com@mail43.us4.mcsv.net;

Posted on August 30, 2016December 30, 2021 by admini

[From the desk of Paul Davis – his opinions and no-one else’s]
Apart from the reporter’s opinions 😉
So onto the news:

Mozilla blocks all Flash in Firefox after third zero-day

Mozilla on Monday began blocking all versions of Adobe Flash Player from running automatically in its Firefox browser, reacting to news of even more zero-day vulnerabilities unearthed in a massive document cache pilfered from the Italian Hacking Team surveillance firm.

Computerworld confirmed that the current production versions of Firefox — dubbed v. 39 — on both Windows and OS X now block Flash.

Until Adobe issues a patched version of Flash, Firefox will not automatically engage the player without warning users, even if they have updated Flash to v. 18.0.0.203 since Wednesday, July 8, when Adobe shipped the patch for the first of the zero-day troika.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=235ec877e0&e=20056c7556

Businesses are wasting huge amounts of money due to false positive malware alerts

The Cost of Malware Containment report from the Ponemon Institute (commissioned by Damballa) questioned 550 IT pros and IT security experts across the EMEA, and found that companies are dealing with 10,000 malware alerts per week, but only 22 per cent of those are deemed reliable.

Indeed, only a small amount of those reliable reports are actually considered to be worthy of further investigation – 3.5 per cent in total.

This adds up to an average of 272 hours per week which security staff spend dealing with false positive malware alerts, which the report claims costs each organisation an average of £515,000 every year in lost productivity.

The report also noted that 57 per cent of those questioned said the severity of malware infections hitting their business had increased (or indeed significantly increased) over the past year, with 47 per cent saying that the volume of infections had increased over the same time period.

Despite this increase in numbers and severity, a quarter of respondents admitted they had an “ad hoc approach to containment”, with 38 per cent saying there is no one specific staff member in the company who is accountable for dealing with and containing malware.

Finally, only 37 per cent of those surveyed said that their business has automated tools to capture intelligence and help evaluate the true threat levels malware poses.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=c36fc52275&e=20056c7556

New PHP Releases Fix BACKRONYM MySQL Flaw

Several new versions of PHP have been released, all of which contain a number of bug fixes, most notably a patch for the so-called BACKRONYM vulnerability in MySQL.

The PHP Group fixed this vulnerability in versions 5.6.11, 5.5.27, and 5.4.43.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=5dd94f1e62&e=20056c7556

Malvertising reaches record levels in June

Malvertising campaigns have reached more users than ever before, reported security firm Invincea yesterday, with many brand-name websites affected — including CBS Sports, Yahoo and eBay in the UK, Livestrong, Perez Hilton, Glenn Beck’s TheBlaze.com and the Drudge Report.

The company monitors over 2 million endpoints for suspicious activity. Not only is there more malvertising than before, from more high-profile sites, but most of the malware was new to antivirus vendors.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=ad5ddf0d0f&e=20056c7556

Cybersecurity Gains Higher Profile Among Chief Financial Officers

A new report by Deloitte shows how important cybersecurity risks really are at the board room level, as the nation’s top financial executives expressed their concerns about how security risks could impact their companies’ bottom lines. In its CFO Signals 2015 Q2 survey report, Deloitte found that CFOs consider cyberattacks one of the most threatening crises to potentially impact their enterprise financial health.

Deloitte surveyed 100 CFOs at large North American firms for this poll and found that 97 percent of them considered cyberattacks to be a major threat to their companies. Among those executives, only 10 percent believed their firms to be well-prepared for the threat. And one in four reported they were insufficiently prepared for cyberattacks.

Grant Thornton reported that for 38 percent of organizations, the security buck ultimately stops with the CFO. That’s proportionally more CFOs ultimately in charge of security than even CIOs, 38 percent of whom reported they were the main person tasked with security. Meanwhile, just 7 percent of CISOs reported ultimate responsibility.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=a5861874f4&e=20056c7556

The New Corporate Star: CIGOs

Organizations are […] turning to a new data professional: the Chief Information Governance Officer (CIGO). The CIGO stands at the juncture of cybersecurity and information governance. The CIGO is responsible for an organization’s information governance program and relevant staff and oversees information asset issues relating to risk management: compliance, privacy and IT security; electronic data discovery; records and information management and retention; imaging and electronically stored information initiatives; and best practices.

The CIGO does not replace the chief privacy officer or chief data officer. Instead, the position is designed to complement those other roles by coordinating records management and e-discovery together with security, compliance, data governance, risk management and privacy.

The CIGO’s role is to break down the various disparate and siloed data and information activities spread throughout an organization and to take a systematic approach, rather than an ad hoc one, to protecting a firm’s most valuable resources. And that’s why the CIGO is the new corporate star.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=288cf437c9&e=20056c7556

Searching the Enterprise for Known Indicators of Breach

Multiple vendors are offering cloud-based sandbox analytics services, and/or on-premises appliances, that can analyze new binaries to determine if they have suspicious behavior. These services are aimed at the kind of high-end evasive malware that has avoided detection from the traditional AV solutions. Network vendors have been very active in integrating this capability into their network controls – next generation firewalls and IPS.

These are powerful tools. Unfortunately, these systems are primarily looking at traffic over the network. They lack visibility when those binaries have already made it to the high value assets within the network. And, we know there are all sorts of attack vectors into a network that may not be through the common ingress point that the network breach detection appliances are monitoring.

Tripwire now offers several important use cases to help our customers address this challenge, ranging from stand-alone one-off situations to fully integrated security automations.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=1044dc6f16&e=20056c7556

FireEye Study: APT3 Threat Group Targets US Firms with Phishing Email

FireEye security professionals have found that the China-based APT3 persistent threat group has used an unpatched Adobe Flash Player zero-day bug to launch a spear phishing campaign against multiple U.S. industries, FCW reported Monday.

Mark Rockwell writes FireEye identified aerospace, defense, construction, engineering, transportation, high-technology and telecommunication companies as the targets in APT3’s Operation Clandestine Wolf in early June.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=571a6d01f7&e=20056c7556

============================================================
Feedback, questions? Our mailing address is: ** dailynews@paulgdavis.com (mailto:dailynews@paulgdavis.com)

If someone forwarded this email to you and you want to be added in,
please click this: ** Subscribe to this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a)

** Unsubscribe from this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556&c=794d4d1df2)

** Update subscription preferences (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/profile?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme