Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=mail=3Dpaulgdavis.com@mail10.atl31.mcdlv.net;

Posted on September 11, 2016December 30, 2021 by admini

[From the desk of Paul Davis – his opinions and no-one else’s]
Apart from the reporter’s opinions 😉
So onto the news:

3 Positive Signs for Better Security in Cloud Computing
Whether you’re a large corporation, a nonprofit organization, or an everyday person who wants to share your data with others, you’ve probably jumped on the cloud phenomenon already.
Like many forms of cognitive computing, cognitive security can self-learn and adapt from previous experiences based on new data it’s presented with.
Once it’s fed this data, it will mine it for information and isolate patterns that should be followed in the future, just as iPhone’s Siri can learn from its user’s vocabulary and habits to focus its service.
Another method employed to boost cloud security involves creating more stringent access points, where users are sent through a very particular gateway that will analyze the validity and intentions of their entrance.
This has the aim of catching hackers and viruses before they ever reach the cloud.
Products like these would be able to authenticate users, enforce data protection policies, and even control the way users can access applications and share information, which would allow the security system to monitor it tightly.
The IBM Cloud Security Enforcer takes on a similar tactic to the gateways by monitoring what actions are being taken in the cloud with an extreme level of detail.
By approving certain applications, the Enforcer only allows a user access after strictly checking their authenticity and collecting data on their habits within the cloud.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=b33ece50dd&e=20056c7556

Trend Micro: Lessons learned from 2015 cyber attacks
Following an onslaught year of massive breaches, 2016 promises to usher in more of the same, but with each breach there was a lesson to be learned, according to a Trend Micro report.
Trend Micro suggested organizations implement the following remedial measures:
• Advanced sandboxing capabilities to detect malware in spear phishing emails
• File integrity monitoring and log inspection to improve situational awareness of unusual network behavior and lateral movements
• Intrusion detection/prevention to shield unpatched vulnerabilities
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=c05845e524&e=20056c7556

What is ‘infrastructure as code’ and why should you embrace it?
IAC is a type of IT infrastructure provisioning process where systems are automatically built, managed and provisioned through code, rather than less flexible scripting or a manual process.
That’s why IAC is sometimes referred to as programmable infrastructure.
It makes the process faster and eliminates human error, once you get your code solid.
By using code to automate the process of setting up and configuring a virtual machine or container, you have a fast and repeatable method for replicating the process.
So if you build a virtual environment for the development of application, once you are ready to deploy you can repeat the process of creating that VM simply by running the same code.
The first thing to remember is that IAC is not a product, it’s a methodology.
It’s a process to an end, which is the rapid deployment of a virtual environment.
Agile is necessary because IAC is all about speed. “One of the big things is your development team will move fast.
They are embracing new approaches to software development using agile.
Actually, their sprints are much faster, so waterfall concepts are going out the window,” Riley says.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=9659461563&e=20056c7556

Using surveys to gauge employees’ security perceptions
In-house critics of security-related surveys say that once we get this type of information, the organization or the facility is somehow “put on notice” and will have to take immediate steps to correct every single deficiency before they can open the doors again.
This is an overreaction.
The truth is that every public or private facility is already at a high watermark for liability anyway.
We will always be questioned by outsiders (or plaintiff’s lawyers) as to the safety and security of our entire building: from slip and falls in a wet restroom; to an attack by a mentally-ill homeless person against a city employee; to a cyber-attack on our private customer list; car thefts in the employee lot; to a current or former employee active shooter situation.
Consider the following survey for your employees.
You can modify these questions (just a bit) to fit your specific organization, but be careful not to change the meaning too much just because you might be wary of the answers.
You should tell all employees that your first step is to gather their opinions, analyze and prioritize their concerns, give them an overview of what you heard from them, and then discuss what you plan to do going forward.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=f2723a0fbc&e=20056c7556

Feds eye new IT security suite to prevent attacks, block websites
In-house critics of security-related surveys say that once we get this type of information, the organization or the facility is somehow “put on notice” and will have to take immediate steps to correct every single deficiency before they can open the doors again.
This is an overreaction.
The truth is that every public or private facility is already at a high watermark for liability anyway.
We will always be questioned by outsiders (or plaintiff’s lawyers) as to the safety and security of our entire building: from slip and falls in a wet restroom; to an attack by a mentally-ill homeless person against a city employee; to a cyber-attack on our private customer list; car thefts in the employee lot; to a current or former employee active shooter situation.
Consider the following survey for your employees.
You can modify these questions (just a bit) to fit your specific organization, but be careful not to change the meaning too much just because you might be wary of the answers.
You should tell all employees that your first step is to gather their opinions, analyze and prioritize their concerns, give them an overview of what you heard from them, and then discuss what you plan to do going forward.
Bureaucrats considering a little online shopping or Internet poker during business hours beware: Shared Services Canada is looking to stop you.
The federal government’s central IT department is looking for a new unified security platform to do everything from pinpointing individual Internet usage, to preventing malicious actors from intruding on government networks, to blocking pornography and online gaming sites.
To that end, Shared Services Canada is considering buying a “unified threat management” (UTM) program — a single platform to provide firewalls, virus scanning, intrusion detection, web filtering, and virtual private networking to allow secure connections for public servants working remotely.
The system envisioned by the central IT agency includes the ability to monitor government networks in real-time, from individual web traffic to department-wide analysis.
The UTM would need to cover everyone from bureaucrats working from home to massive public offices in Ottawa.
Shared Services hopes that the proposed security platform could help prevent future DDoS attacks, by identifying the unique communication patterns botnets produce.
The platform is also expected to detect and prevent damage from malware downloaded through emails or from Internet sites.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=16af01ced8&e=20056c7556

Cyber security incidents on the rise in Indian enterprises, but information security function not keeping pace
According to EY’s Global Information Security Survey (GISS) 2015, which involved more than 200 Indian CIOs and CISOs, approximately 20% of respondents reported financial damages up to INR15 million due to information security incidents over the past year.
More importantly, 27% of the respondents reported that they were unaware of the extent of financial damage due to information security incidents.
This combined with the fact that close to 40% of respondents reported that their Security Operations Center (SOC) takes more than four hours to initiate an investigation on discovered/alerted incidents, highlights the vulnerability of Indian organizations to security incidents.
Cyber-attacks originate from a multitude of sources, including but not limited to criminal syndicates, hacktivists, lone wolves, and external contractors among others.
The Global Information Security Survey found that 70% respondents considered hacktivists and 55% considered criminal syndicates as the most likely source of attack.
Budgetary constraints and lack of skilled resources are the major reasons which impact the contribution and value that information security function provides to the organization, indicating that the situation is deteriorating, rather than improving.
The digital world does not allow any organization to feel comfortable in the area of cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
As the saying by Sun Tzu goes, “The more we sweat in peace, the less we bleed in war”, organizations will have to be on constant guard to respond to the evolving threat landscape.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e6ab9ff477&e=20056c7556

Cybersecurity incident response: Planning is just the beginning
According to the 2015 U.S.
Cost of a Data Breach Study1 by the Ponemon Institute, last year there was an 11% increase in the total cost of a data breach, to a $217 average per lost or stolen record.
Key findings include:
Simply having a cybersecurity incident response (IR) plan is not enough.
It must be reviewed and updated regularly as part of a comprehensive cybersecurity incident response program.
Regular training and exercises are important in keeping the IR plan effective.
Employees can be a critical line of defense.
Board involvement is crucial.
Senior management and the board need to have open dialogue about expectations regarding risk tolerances, budget considerations, IR planning and breach response.
General liability insurance and director’s insurance most likely will not cover a cybersecurity incident.
A full review of insurance should be an integral part of cyberrisk management.
The risks of cyberattacks span functions and business units, companies and customers.
Given the stakes and the challenging circumstances related to becoming cyberresilient, making the decisions necessary can only be achieved with active engagement from the CEO and other members of the senior management team.8 Cybersecurity is not a check-the-box-and-you’re-done issue.
It requires a commitment of time and resources.
It’s too late to start planning for a breach once a breach has taken place.
Start planning now; best practices begin with a cybersecurity incident response plan as part of a comprehensive IR program.
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=d2386cea73&e=20056c7556

Tor Project to launch bug bounty program in 2016
he program, which has the Tor Project partnering with HackerOne, initially would “start out invite-only so we can get used to flow and scale up.” The program will be made public “later in the year to basically provide people with incentive to review our code to look for vulnerabilities that might be specific to our applications,” he said.
Perry and his team have had a challenging year “keeping up with Firefox release treadmill,” ensuring that “their features adhere to our privacy models” and that the Tor releases come out same day as the Mozilla releases so that no vulnerability is left exposed.
He said there was a “solid three-to-four months where we felt like we were doing a release every two weeks.”
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e57eabf1cb&e=20056c7556

Ransomware, attacks on wearables: Intel McAfee Labs’ top security predictions for 2016
Intel Security has released its McAfee Labs Threats Predictions report, which enlists key security threats in 2016 till 2020.
The report includes an overview of cyber-attacks and threats on hardware, wearables, cloud services, etc and the possible response of IT security industry to them.
Predictions through 2016
Hardware
Hardware
Wearables
Attacks through employee systems
Cloud services
Automobiles
Warehouses of stolen data
Integrity attacks
Sharing threat intelligence
Predictions through 2020
Below-the-OS attacks
Detection evasion
New devices, new attack surfaces
Cyberespionage goes corporate
Privacy challenges, opportunities
Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=4cdec16d91&e=20056c7556

============================================================
Feedback, questions? Our mailing address is: ** dailynews@paulgdavis.com (mailto:dailynews@paulgdavis.com)

If you know someone else who would be interested in this Newsalert, please forwarded this email.
If you want to be added to the distribution list, please click this: ** Subscribe to this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage1.com/subscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a)

** Unsubscribe from this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556&c=76f6e1bc1f)

** Update subscription preferences (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/profile?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme