Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=mail=3Dpaulgdavis.com@mail140.wdc02.mcdlv.net;

Posted on September 11, 2016December 30, 2021 by admini

[From the desk of Paul Davis – his opinions and no-one else’s]
Apart from the reporter’s opinions 😉
So onto the news:

Banks And Insurance Companies Aware Of Cyber Risks: Opportunities Remain To Become More Resilient

Nearly two-thirds (63%) of more than 900 C-suite executives around the world who participated in a recent Accenture Strategy study, “Business Resilience in the Face of Cyber Risk,” reported that their companies experience significant cyber attacks daily or weekly. Banking executives responded in kind with the same frequency, and 59% of insurance executives responded likewise.

The findings are consistent with the “2015 Accenture Global Risk Management Study” which found that nearly two-thirds of banking executives (65%) and 74% of insurance executives expect cyber IT risks to increase. Given that, these executives expect to hire more people who are experts in managing cyber risks. For these executives, the question is not “if” but “when” an event will occur.

Although the chief information officer (CIO) is most frequently cited as being responsible for resilience management at insurance companies and banks (61% and 41%, respectively), successful enterprises recognize that responsibility for resilience and agility should not just fall to the CIO, chief risk officer or chief information security officer. On average, companies tend to have two executives in their C-suite who are responsible for continuously monitoring and improving their business resilience.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=8fc28dc793&e=20056c7556

Using the COSO Framework to Mitigate Cyber Risks

Cyber risks cannot be avoided, but such risks can be managed better through careful design and implementation of appropriate controls. Using the internal control framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as a guide, organizations can build preventive and detective controls aimed at mitigating cyberthreats to an acceptable level.

The 2013 COSO Framework comprises five internal control components and 17 related principles. The Framework recommends that organizations perform a risk assessment to define its objectives, evaluate cyber risks that can hinder objectives and develop a priority list of critical information systems to protect against identified risks before they begin designing and implementing control activities.

Control structures should be deployed in a layered approach that helps prevent infiltrators from accessing subsequent information systems after the initial layers of defense are compromised. “One of the most important questions an organization should consider when designing control activities is whether its cyber environment is protected by different layers of security,” said Mary Galligan, a Deloitte Advisory director at Deloitte & Touche LLP in Cyber Risk Services, and former FBI special agent in charge of Cyber and Special Operations for the New York office. “Multiple layers of effective defense means there is no one single point of failure, which is a critical element of cybersecurity and access management around data,” added Ms. Galligan.

Under the 2013 Framework, the monitoring component comprises activities performed by management to evaluate effectiveness of internal controls and communicate, manage and remediate identified deficiencies. “However, the complexities of cyber risk can be daunting, and the board and management may need technical IT concepts translated into how cyber risks affect an organization’s objectives and business priorities to accomplish their oversight and risk management responsibilities,” observed Ms. Herrygers. Further, boards and management should be made aware of what value information systems provide with respect to meeting the organization’s objectives. This information can help leadership define risk tolerance levels and direct adequate investment to protection systems critical to meeting an organization’s objectives.

Link: http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=f78dd06bb9&e=20056c7556

============================================================
Feedback, questions? Our mailing address is: ** dailynews@paulgdavis.com (mailto:dailynews@paulgdavis.com)

If someone forwarded this email to you and you want to be added in,
please click this: ** Subscribe to this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a)

** Unsubscribe from this list (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556&c=3e7183c266)

** Update subscription preferences (http://paulgdavis.us3.list-manage.com/profile?u=45bf3caf699abf9904ddc00e3&id=e09452545a&e=20056c7556)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme