Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

Feds’ Security Spending On a Roll: Over 8 Percent Growth Over Next Five Years

Posted on October 23, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

“We see this as a bright spot in federal spending,” says John Slye, principal analyst at Input, which expects a compound annual growth rate of 8.1 percent for security from 2009 to 2014.

Input says the top 10 executive branch departments — the Office of the Secretary of Defense, U.S. Air Force, Homeland Security, Army, Navy, Department of Energy, Health and Human Services, Justice Department, Treasury Department, and Commerce Department — account for 65 percent of all federal IT spending.

“We’ve seen that with the identity and access management market that FISMA and HSPD12 created,” he says.

Input last year forecast a 7.7 percent compounded annual growth rate for federal security spending through 2013.

http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/government/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900236

Read more

CIA Invests In Social Media Monitoring Technology

Posted on October 22, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

In-Q-Tel, the investment firm established by the CIA to support U.S. intelligence agencies, has invested in Visible Technologies, a start-up that monitors social media content on the Web.

Visible Technologies’ software-as-a-service apps are used by companies to monitor and manage their brands by observing and analyzing public opinion on the Web in real-time. Visible Technologies’ TruCAST engine “casts a net on whatever the client wants to know more about,” said senior VP Blake Cahill. Visible Technologies has been focusing increasingly on the government sector, and it has done some work through the General Services Administration, according to Cahill.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/info-management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900005

Read more

Information Security Still a Priority In IT Budgets

Posted on October 21, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

According to PricewaterhouseCooper’s (New York) Global State of Information Security 2010 survey, information security executives are facing more challenges today than ever. Surprisingly, however, they are not being starved of the resources they need to keep company data safe.

PwC surveyed its own clients in 130 countries, plus the readers of CIO Magazine and CSO Magazine.

Technology and financial services companies consisted of the top two in terms of survey participants, at 1,250 and 1,165 respondents, respectively.

Mark Lobel, a principal with PwC in its security practice, told attendees at a conference unveiling the survey results on Wednesday that he and his team weren’t too optimistic about what they would find, given all the news of layoffs and budget cutbacks.

Even in this crisis, 38 percent of global companies said they still plan to increase their information security spending.

Forty-three percent of respondents said their companies are deferring security initiatives for capital expenditures, while 40 percent said they were deferring these initiatives for operating expenditures.

“I believe that moving from 2009 to 2010 will be a coming of age for information security,” he said.

Even so, information security executives are experiencing more pressure from the top to prove the value of their expenditures on security technology. Further findings from the survey found that there has been a steady increase in security incidents from 2008 to 2009, with 35 percent of companies reporting 1 to 9 incidents, versus 30 percent last year.

Also, data is the biggest target of cyber thieves: 23 percent this year, as opposed to 16 percent in 2008. Although respondents said 33 percent of incidents occurred because of a current employees, 39 percent didn’t know whether it was from the inside, a former employee or a hacker.

It’s no longer acceptable to reactively hear about a breach. Again, referring to the leadership role financial services has shown in data security, Lobel indicated another finding: that although the downturn is a driver for companies’ infosec spending, it had less of an impact on financial services than other sectors (38 percent for financial services versus 43 percent for technology, 42 percent for healthcare and 41 percent for the retail industry).

http://www.banktech.com/risk-management/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=LTGLRGEA3IYVFQE1GHPSKHWATMY32JVN?articleID=220800154&_requestid=525984

Read more

Microsoft’s Global Security Operations Center (GSOC) Technology Solution

Posted on October 16, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

More information
•Global Security White Paper
•GSOC Datasheet

Core technologies include
•Office SharePoint Server
•Office InfoPath
•Office Communications Server
•Office Groove
Contact Us
Email Us at: GSOCTours@microsoft.com

Regional Contact Information:

Americas
Contact: Joe Fairchild
Email: v-jofair@microsoft.com
Phone: +1 425-829-3126

EMEA
Contact: Geoff Paulsen
Email: v-gepaul@microsoft.com
Phone: +44 7815 636582

Asia
Contact: Mohan Shanmugasundaram
Email: v-moshan@microsoft.com
Phone: +65 68888749

http://www.microsoft.com/industry/publicsector/csa/GlobalSecurityOperationsCenter.aspx

Read more

Transglobal Secure Collaboration Program Welcome CA, Inc.

Posted on October 13, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

The CA Security Management business, which provides integrated identity and access management, security information management, and data loss prevention solutions, will be collaborating with TSCP to help partners accelerate adoption of standards designed to build a globally secure critical infrastructure.

As the newest TSCP Gold member, CA will actively participate in reference implementations of TSCP’s secure collaboration specifications and speed time to market for commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions that are aligned with industry requirements. “Several of our customers and partners are represented in this program and we consider it a privilege to be working with them to fulfill the TSCP mission,” said Dave Hansen, corporate senior vice president and general manager for CA Security Management. “Our global A&D and government agency customers are involved in global mission-critical projects, and we understand the challenges for secure collaboration at that level.

CA will participate by providing technology expertise for world-class identity and access management, including Web access management, identity federation, single sign-on, user provisioning and more.

http://nasdaq-ca.blogspot.com/2009/10/transglobal-secure-collaboration_14.html

Read more

Six Steps Toward Better Database Security Compliance

Posted on October 10, 2009December 30, 2021 by admini

1. Database Discovery And Risk Assessment Before organizations can start their database compliance efforts, they must first find the databases — and where the regulated data resides in them.
“That’s a big challenge for a lot of folks. They know where their mainframes are, and they know where a lot of their systems are but…they don’t really know which database systems they have on their network,” says Josh Shaul, vice president of product management for Application Security, a database security company.

2. Vulnerability And Configuration Management Once an inventory has been developed, organizations need to look at the databases themselves.
“Basic configuration and vulnerability assessment of databases is a key starting point for enterprises,” Shaul says.

3. Access Management and Segregation of Duties Figuring out who has access to regulated data, what kind of access they are given, and whether that access is appropriate for their jobs is at the heart of complying with regulatory mandates. “Sometimes it’s as simple as account management, password controls, and removing default accounts,” Laliberte says. Organizations need to be vigilant to constantly review roles and entitlements to prevent toxic combinations of privileges. Take, for example, a payments clerk who gets a promotion to run the accounts payable department. In the new position, that person “owns” the AP system and has the ability to modify and delete checks that have been written.

4. Monitoring Risky Behaviors And Users Unfortunately there is a built-in segregation of duties violation in every database — and it’s one you can’t get rid of, Shaul says.
“Databases in general don’t give you the ability to take away DBAs’ data access away from them,” Shaul says. “And that’s what auditors are coming in and flagging folks for, saying, ‘First and foremost, you’ve got this easy-to-find segregation of duties violation. This exposure is one reason why database activity monitoring is so critical to enterprises seeking to satisfy regulatory requirements. Unfortunately, all too many organizations fail to log, track, or monitor database activity because they worry that such monitoring may affect database performance. DBAs and other database stakeholders should know that today’s third-party monitoring tools aren’t nearly as burdensome to database performance as in years past, experts say.

5. Reporting On Compensating Controls In those instances where organizations have appropriate compensating controls in place, auditors want proof that these controls actually exist, Laliberte says.

6. Following Defense-In-Depth Strategies Finally, it is important to remember to keep a little perspective on the matter of database security and compliance.
“This is really just a piece of what has to be a pretty large security program that’s going to allow you to meet these regulations,” says Mike Rothman, senior vice president of strategy for eIQnetworks, a security information and event management company.

Phil Lieberman, president of Lieberman Software, a password management company, believes this is one of the biggest database risks of all. The data may be secure on the server, but if someone with ill intent gets hold of the unencrypted tape, then it will be compromised all the same.

http://www.darkreading.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220600156

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme