Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

Patching Offline VMware Machines

Posted on September 14, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Patch deployment to virtual and physical systems just got a lot easier with the Sept. 2 release of Shavlik NetChk Protect 6.5. With the ability to deploy patches to offline VMware virtual machines, IT managers can now be confident that VMs that are only used occasionally will spin up with the most current patches, hot fixes and service packs.

NetChk Pro 6.5 is focused on the Microsoft Windows/VMware environment, which is counter to the hypervisor cross-platform I’d like to see in a product that receives an eWEEK Labs Analyst Choice award. Even with this significant lack, IT managers should put Shavlik’s NetChk Pro 6.5 at the very top of any security strategy plan for the labor- and time-saving advantages that come from the ability to automatically and consistently apply updates to offline VMs that are otherwise quite difficult to keep up-to-date.

Both VMware Update and Shavlik NetChk Protect can scan and patch the online and offline ESX Server images.

A Shavlik NetChk Protect license costs a one-time license fee of $75 per server and $35 per workstation, plus 25 percent maintenance per year at quantity 100.

The basic mechanics of working with offline VMs involved placing the machines into a special offline group in the NetChk console. In my tests, the NetChk scheduler worked as described; updates that were scheduled in the future were not executed until the correct date. Because I tested NetChk Protect in a VMware infrastructure environment using ESX Servers managed by VirtualCenter 2.5 (see review here), I browsed to my VirtualCenter system and then to the ESX server and selected my virtual images.

This first version of Shavlik’s offline scanning and patching tool isn’t without some blemishes. They are scanned as part of the traditional scan process that is normally used to manager patching for running systems. In practical terms, this meant that I got “machine not scanned” messages when normally offline images were part of a scan job, which could be construed as errors by IT operations staff. Additional funniness was encountered in the UI, including a message that patch databases were being updated from Shavlik’s secure site even when the product was configured to run in disconnected mode. As well, virtual machines that were online during initial scanning but then were taken offline and subsequently scanned were still assigned the “connected” icon in status monitoring screens, which again caused me some confusion during testing and will likely confuse IT staff. Role-based administration fundamentally means that patch management can be devolved to lower level staff.

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Virtualization/Patching-Offline-VMware-Machines/?kc=EWKNLSTE09162008STR2

Read more

Keys to Locking Down Storage Security on a Database

Posted on September 13, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

All storage, structured or unstructured, requires security of some kind, even if it’s simply flipping an on/off switch or pulling the USB plug on a direct-attached external disk. Database storage security, the subject of this article, can be slightly more complicated than that.

I talked recently with Ted Julian, vice president of consultancy Application Security, about the often-thorny security issues surrounding structured content in databases. Julian drew up a detailed look, in several steps, at what he sees as important in database security, starting with data discovery and moving all the way through how to implement intrusion detection.

First of all, you need to know exactly what you are securing. “This is perhaps one of the easiest, yet most critical, steps in getting started in protecting your data—knowing where it is,” Julian said. “The point being that, if you are looking to shore up protection against attacks on your data, if you aren’t sure where that data resides, chances are that it’s not currently protected. Once you can establish where your databases are residing within your environment, you can get started on assessing your overall environment and taking an inventory of your data assets.”

Julian said database administrators need to inventory all databases, identify the vulnerabilities that are present and create a baseline of current security assets for ongoing comparison. The ability to track and monitor progress is an important component of most compliance initiatives. This process will help organizations identify common flaws, including unpatched systems, weak or default passwords, excessive privileges and a lack of system monitoring. The task can be streamlined by utilizing technological solutions to assist with discovery, to establish a security posture baseline and to generate fix scripts to speed along remediation. A complete database security solution will also include policies to monitor for threats and vulnerabilities in real time, Julian said.

DBAs need to prioritize their most pressing issues up front. “Comprehensive database security efforts are based on vulnerability and threat data, including vulnerability severity and the criticality of the database information,” Julian said. “Once priorities are documented, an organization should to enact a formal security plan, report on progress and demonstrate ongoing improvement.”

In order to mitigate risk and improve the database security posture, the next step in shoring up security at the database level is to fix or remediate known vulnerabilities. Software patches and known workarounds should be applied. “Not all vulnerabilities can be eliminated or patched immediately.

Customized policies and real-time alerting on suspicious activities allows an organization to proactively respond to threats,” Julian said. According to Julian, Application Security’s Database Security Lifecycle methodology allows enterprises to extend layered defenses to the repositories of their most critical and confidential information and as a result significantly minimize security risk.

These steps are an important component of any compliance effort; they enable organizations to respond promptly and provide informed remediation and notification when necessary, he said.

Here are some basic database security steps enterprises can take that will improve their database security postures in just one day. Every database Oracle has ever shipped has come with a set of default accounts and passwords. These user names and passwords are well known and documented. “Default passwords are problematic, because they leave the front door to your database wide open,” Julian said. There are currently over 600 known default user name and password combinations and probably a dozen free tools to scan for them, Julian said. By the way, Oracle11g includes a built-in DBA view to list default passwords (DBA_USERS_WITH_DEFPWD). One of the most common attack vectors to this day is access via passwords that can be easily guessed. Passwords should be eight or more characters in length; 14 characters or longer is ideal. A 15-character password composed only of random letters and numbers is about 33,000 times stronger than an eight-character password that uses characters from the entire keyboard.

A crucial element of securing the database is to ensure that patches are implemented in a timely manner and known vulnerabilities are monitored in real time. Automate security tasks as a regular part of database maintenance. So much of security relies on regular assessments and validation; the day-to-day work can quickly decline into tedium and get overlooked. Utilizing software that provides regular security updates for patches, new threats and known vulnerabilities is essential to protecting the database and containing risk.

Protecting data at its source, the database, is essential to preventing breaches and data loss. Even with traditional perimeter security measures in place, the best way to defend against data harvesting (where attackers remove or damage large amounts of data) is to rely on a layered defense model that necessarily includes the database.

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Data-Storage/Keys-to-Locking-Down-Storage-Security-on-a-Database/?kc=rss

Read more

CookieMonster Can Steal HTTPS Cookies

Posted on September 12, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

Sadly, it turns out that many Web sites do not properly set the “Encrypted Sessions Only” property of their cookies.

Because HTTPS cookies are full of tasty authentication information, they can be used to access online banking accounts, Webmail accounts, and the like.

Perry proposes the following test to see whether sites you use are vulnerable: “To check your sites under Firefox, go to the Privacy tab in the Preferences window, and click on ‘Show Cookies.’ For a given site, inspect the individual cookies for the top level name of the site, and any subdomain names, and if any have ‘Send For: Encrypted connections only,’ delete them.

Having tried these steps with two “Encrypted connections only” Google (NSDQ: GOOG) cookies, Google appears to be vulnerable to a CookieMonster attack. A Google spokesperson confirmed this to be the case and said the company’s engineers are working with Perry to eliminate the vulnerability.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=2P0R3N2D1VQU4QSNDLPCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=210601197

Read more

Enterprises Struggle to Identify Sources of Risk

Posted on September 12, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

More than a third of respondents plan to implement risk management tools across all of their business units in the next 12 months; another 26 percent will implement such tools with some business units. In 2006, about 40 percent of respondents said internal attacks were their top concern; that figure has dropped to 33 percent.

“Given all the attention that’s been paid to user awareness in the past few years, it’s sort of surprising that the user issue continues to be such a big part of the problem,” says Rick Blum, director of strategic marketing at BT. “This will require quantifying the potential cost of data loss as well as downtime caused by a virus or other attack,” the report states.

“These costs should take into account financial damages (outright theft), recovery costs (notification of affected parties, etc.), and loss of reputation (leading to loss of business).”

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=163569&WT.svl=news2_1

Read more

Report: In-Depth Analysis Finds More Severe Web Flaws

Posted on September 11, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

As usual, the vulnerabilities most found in Web applications were cross-site scripting, information leakage, and SQL injection.

XSS accounted for 41 percent of all vulnerabilities; information leakage, 32 percent; SQL injection, 9 percent; and predictable resource location flaws, 8 percent.

“Looking at the numbers, I thought SQL injection would have a bigger presence in the number of vulnerabilities and vulnerable sites. Although the statistics seem to show the number is decreasing from previous years, do not stop fighting this class of attack, and all types of injection in general!!

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=163467&WT.svl=news2_4

Read more

CIS looks to community for security metrics

Posted on September 10, 2008December 30, 2021 by admini

To measure a company’s ability to deal with security incidents, the group suggested that companies measure the mean time between security incidents and the mean time to recover from security incidents.

As an indicator of a company’s network security readiness, companies should measure the fraction of systems configured to approved standards, the fraction of systems patched as per corporate policy, and the fraction of systems with antivirus software, CIS stated.

Finally, companies should review their software applications for potential security issues by measuring the fraction of business applications that have had a risk assessment, the fraction with a penetration or vulnerability assessment and the fraction of application code that had a threat-model analysis or security code review prior to deployment.

http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/814?ref=rss

Read more

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-25
  • IT Security News – 2023-09-20

Archives

  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme