Skip to content

CyberSecurity Institute

Security News Curated from across the world

Menu
Menu

Author: admini

Security’s Soft Underbelly

Posted on June 6, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

We queried 649 highly experienced IT professionals, more than 70 percent of which are responsible for managing all or part of their organizations IT budget — a solid barometer for corporate priorities.

Of the 2007 total corporate IT budget, respondents said they have allocated 34 percent for database infrastructure and 20.6 percent for IT security overall.

More than 53 percent believe their databases are critical to their businesses. But only 15 percent said that extending security best practices to the database is a “critical priority” for 2007.

Higher priorities included upgrading applications (25 percent), improving the efficiency of IT (20 percent), and consolidating IT infrastructure (19 percent). Upgrading security overall (13 percent) finished slightly lower, as did supporting Sarbanes-Oxley (10 percent) and upgrading disaster recovery capabilities (9 percent).

Interestingly, 92 percent of respondents are seeking a better tool to help them identify and analyze risk factors that exist within their systems or IT infrastructure.

This makes sense, particularly as a majority of respondents plan no, or only slight, increases in IT staff in 2007. According to our study results, IT security practitioners are fairly confident they can stop hackers from compromising their systems (68 percent), but they are far less certain that they can prevent malicious insiders (43 percent) and negligence (45 percent).

Respondents in larger organizations are more confident than those in smaller-sized companies when it comes to their ability to control these threats. Respondents’ database environments are of substantial scale and complexity — a majority of respondents manage more than 500 databases.

Robust access controls, ease of integration, and the ability to identify unauthorized access are viewed as the three most important features.

http://www.appsecinc.com/news/pr/2007_6_04_Ponemon-Study.shtml

Read more

House passes restrictive anti-spyware bill

Posted on June 6, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

A group of Web sites, including Google and CNET Networks, that rely on interactive advertising have lobbied for nearly a dozen changes (PDF) to the bill.

The Information Technology Association of America, the American Bankers Association and the Interactive Advertising Bureau have all favored the I-SPY Act over the SPY Act, stated an CNET News.com article.

http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/519?ref=rss

Read more

Forget security and privacy: Focus on trust

Posted on June 1, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

Money and investments focused on security and privacy are most often viewed as insurance premiums-to be kept to a minimum consistent with the negative risk experience of each institution. Such spending is certainly not perceived as an investment for winning stakeholders, sustaining excellence or achieving market leadership.

But today’s world, where an increasing majority of institutions do business online using telecommunications networks that span the globe, security and privacy protections expressed in negative terms don’t make the grade. They must adopt an approach based on winning the trust of all stakeholders-customers, employees, channel partners, contractors, vendors and shareholders all.

Trust means stakeholders feel safe in the hands of these enterprises and are confident in the secure delivery of their products and services along with protection of their private information. Given the status of security and privacy today, the CIO is most often anointed as enterprise information security and privacy champion. When stakeholders’ experiences with an institution consistently meet or exceed their expectations, these experiences build awareness, then breed familiarity and finally, earn trust-which inevitably translates into profit.

Amex provided its card members and service establishments with, at the time, a revolutionary new way to do business: They could execute secure and private financial transactions anytime anywhere in the world. The linchpin of this model was and is the magnetic-striped card that identifies and validates individual card members and other authorized stakeholders to use the integrated global network.

A trust-based business model is also a natural extension of enterprises’ commitment to compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) regulations and the transparency that results. They need to create incentives for their executive management to create an operating model that earns stakeholders’ trust. Companies will use trust to forge new alliances with stakeholders by guaranteeing secure and private interoperability. And in doing so, companies will define competitive success in a global online real-time marketplace.

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/053107-forget-security-and-privacy-focus.html

Read more

Plug the holes in your cone of silence

Posted on June 1, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

Lost data includes customer, financial, corporate, employee, and IT security data that is stolen, leaked or destroyed. Loss of sensitive, confidential corporate data can also give a rival company a competitive advantage. It might, for example, include results of market research, competitive intelligence analysis of another company, research and development results, financial information, or a list of possible staff redundancies.

“In most organisations, the most sensitive information is in emails,” says Milton Baar, the director of IT Security consultants Swoose Partnership, and committee member of the ISO 27001 international security standard for information management. Mr Baar says three factors should be considered in assessing data loss: confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The integrity of data is maintained by ensuring that information is changed only by those allowed to do so, but organisations also need to make sure that data can be accessed when it is required. Confidentiality is often breached when emails are sent, accidentally or intentionally, to people who should not be seeing them, or when emails are sent before information should be made public.

Mr Baar says staff should be trained in the use of email, helping them understand what information is sensitive. “Have black and white lists, where the server stops sending out and/or receiving emails to or from certain places,” he says. “Have word searches in outbound emails to ensure that sensitive information isn’t disclosed, accidentally or intentionally. Mark the information physically or electronically with its security classification.” Attachments could be protected from email disclosure by having Access Control List entries that allowed them to be sent or blocked depending on the classification and destination of the information, he says.

Cybertrust security consultant Andrew Walls says that the “number one issue” for organisations is classification of their data. Is it important that some data remains confidential no matter whether its integrity is critical or how important it is to have the information readily accessible.

“The critical thing is for business to say what is important, then apply security controls. What role does the data play in an organisation’s plans, including its profitability? At a simple level decide what is a secret, and what is not. If it is a secret, talk to us before accessing it or publishing it,” Mr Walls says. “Don’t expect the IT security people to make these decisions; classifying the data is a business decision.”

Mr Walls says the Australian Government has five tiers of classification: public data, internal use only, confidential, protected and highly protected. At each tier a decision is made on how important are confidentiality, integrity and availability. Mr Baar says the proper use of information standards, such as AS/NZS4360, a risk management standard, would provide a much better basis for decision making. “Poor risk analysis means that the real risks, likelihoods and consequences are not known in detail, therefore the real losses are also unknown,” he says.

Symantec systems engineering manager Paul Lancaster agrees that compliance is not just about the data, but its integrity and availability. Compliance means adhering to regulations that affect a business and what that means for its data storage systems. “Data loss occurs when it can’t be accessed,” says Mr Lancaster. “Organisations have their own products and services they deliver as a business and the data behind that is key. Not having the ability to obtain data to show the public that their data is intact, with no integrity loss, can be detrimental to a business.”

Backing up is one obvious strategy, but how many organisations do this critical task properly? MR BAAR says most hospitals in NSW have multiple secure systems, with servers in two locations to keep patient records secure.

For example, witness protection program lists are closely guarded, and kept on a computer system accessible to only a few, not including the systems administrator. It has Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) certification for its internet gateway service for Australian Commonwealth customers.

Pharmaceutical companies have high security networks, cut off from all other networks. They encrypt their entire networks, “down to the hardware,” Mr Walls says.

Identity theft is a more common problem in Australia, Mr Lancaster says, with fraudsters trying to access laptops and servers to get credit card details or personal information. Employees may have ASIO checks and security clearances for their staff but what about the cleaning staff?

http://www.theage.com.au/news/security/plug-the-holes-in-your-cone-of-silence/2007/05/28/1180205158743.html

Read more

Are security pros worrying about the right stuff?

Posted on May 30, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

They think security pros need to worry more about retaining the best staff and should be careful not to become too consumed with regulatory compliance.

Michael Barrett, CISO at eBay money-transfer service PayPal, says there is always an undercurrent of panic in the event that something blows up. “Most data centers are held together by sheer heroic effort,” he says. When Microsoft discloses software vulnerabilities, as it typically does every first Tuesday of the month, “We’re scurrying about to get patched, and I worry: What will the bad guys do before we patch everything?” Because PayPal is a global company, Barrett says he worries whether the company has the right interpretation on legislation and regulation related to data privacy around the world and the right controls in place.

His long-range concerns have him asking questions such as: In terms of stopping criminals and attackers, do we have the right investment mix and the right set of projects? Are new threats coming up that we need to re-balance that portfolio?

At motion-picture processing and games-manufacturing studio Technicolor in Camarillo, Calif., whose clients include DreamWorks SKG, Sony Pictures Entertainment and Paramount, the top worry is attackers who might steal the entertainment content.

Risk management can sound like a “Mission Impossible” episode in large organizations with many lines of business, tens of thousands of employees, and lots of applications and networks to keep an eye on. “I’m always on call,” says Jalal Zamanali, senior vice president of IT and CISO at Temple-Inland in Austin, Texas, and its subsidiary Guaranty Financial Services, with combined interests in corrugated packaging, forestry, real estate and financial services. Although he has a security staff of 17 to stay abreast of IT projects, Zamanali says his top concern is making sure security controls are on track in terms of regulatory compliance rules related to the Sarbanes-Oxley and Gramm-Leach-Bliley laws. “The chief audit officer has to translate these laws into control points,” Zamanali explains. Consequently, Zamanali — who reports to the chief risk officer — makes sure he meets with the chief audit officer about once a week to discuss compliance issues.

Beth Cannon, CSO at merchant bank Thomas Weisel Partners in San Francisco, says audits to provide evidence that security policies are enforced in IT systems and processes are her main worry.

Consultants and other industry experts don’t dismiss the issues that CSOs and CISOs are worrying about, though they recommend a host of things that might warrant even more of security professionals’ attention. CSOs should worry about losing their jobs because all too often their stance on security is seen by upper management as overly technical or a bad fit, says Jon Gossels, president and CEO of consultancy SystemExperts in Boston. Brad Johnson, vice president at SystemExperts, say one key worry that CSOs should have is where and how they’re going to find and retain the best security-savvy employees.

The Palm Harbor, Fla.-based professional organization International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC2) has had 48,000 security professionals pass its exam for Certified Information Systems Security Professional and other certifications that can often be found listed on the business cards and resumes of CSOs and CISOs.

Zeitler, whose 30-year career included positions as CISO at Volkswagen Credit and head of security at Charles Schwab and Fidelity Investments, says a top concern for CSOs should be whether they can find personnel with the right skills at the right price. He points to computer forensics, which requires people trained in procedures to capture potential evidence and preserve it appropriately, as an example.

Howard Schmidt, the former security chief at eBay and Microsoft and former White House cybersecurity advisor, says there’s no doubt that regulatory-compliance issues are going to be a top worry for the CSO or CISO.

http://www.computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=5254&pubid=3&tab=Home&issueid=112

Read more

PCI Compliance: It Pays Off

Posted on May 26, 2007December 30, 2021 by admini

Most recently updated in September, the PCI standard requires, among other things, firewalls, the encryption of cardholder and other sensitive data sent across public networks, and restrictions on physical access to cardholder data.

Still, he estimates 70% of companies who are obligated by compliance regulations to have PCI — and who would face fines and cur penalties for non-compliance — have PCI in some form today, and are heading toward full implementation.

To counteract such attitudes, Visa, one of the backers of the PCI standard, has embarked on a carrot-and-stick approach with merchants, rewarding those who comply, and threatening financial penalties and other consequences to those who don’t.

http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=124780&f_src=darkreading_section_318

Read more

Posts pagination

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • …
  • 421
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • AI News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • CSO News – Mon, 17 Nov 2025
  • AI/ML News – 2024-04-14
  • Incident Response and Security Operations -2024-04-14
  • CSO News – 2024-04-15

Archives

  • November 2025
  • April 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • September 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • December 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • February 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003

Categories

  • AI-ML
  • Augment / Virtual Reality
  • Blogging
  • Cloud
  • DR/Crisis Response/Crisis Management
  • Editorial
  • Financial
  • Make You Smile
  • Malware
  • Mobility
  • Motor Industry
  • News
  • OTT Video
  • Pending Review
  • Personal
  • Product
  • Regulations
  • Secure
  • Security Industry News
  • Security Operations
  • Statistics
  • Threat Intel
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized
  • Warnings
  • WebSite News
  • Zero Trust

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 CyberSecurity Institute | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme